Quote:
Originally Posted by LFG
Let me state again as clearly as I know how: fuck you Dehah. You are a piece of shit hypocrite on a personal crusade.
|
You continue to make this out like a personal attack, when I've remained calm and stayed on the topic of whether or not this is an exploit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFG
I lack the conviction to do what? What the fuck are you talking about? You are trying to FORCE me to answer questions using words you choose?
What you are doing is trying to back me into the corner you choose. Do think I'm six years old and fall for that shit?
What you are doing is the same as me asking you this question:
JUST ANSWER YES OR NO, DEHAH. WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF? FAILING TO ANSWER YES OR NO MEANS YOU ARE GUILTY AS I'VE CHARGED YOU! YOU CAN ONLY ANSWER YES OR NO - DO NOT ANSWER ANYTHING ELSE:
DO YOUR PARENTS KNOW YOU ARE GAY?
How the fuck are you going to answer a question like that? Like you, I'm INSTRUCTING you that you can only answer yes or no. SO GO AHEAD AND ANSWER YES OR NO, DUMBASS, because with either answer, you are admitting you are gay.
|
Here is what I said in page 9.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dehah
It's not like I asked "Do you still beat your wife?". These questions don't paint you bad no matter what way you answer them. I'll go ahead and answer my own questions as well.
Do you think that it was SOE's intention for players to adorn as many items as possible in anticipation of the refund to amass large quantities of wealth ranging from 100p to 1000p virtually over night?
No, I do not think SOE intended for people to make over 100p from crafting a few adornments. To earn that much from tradeskill writs would take an extremely long time and I refuse to believe it was SOE's intention.
Do you think SOE made a mistake with how they decided who got a refund and how much they got? If yes, did you knowingly take advantage of their mistake?
Yes, I do think SOE made a mistake. They should not have announced this information, they also should have limited how many refunds a specific player was entitled to. No, I did not take advantage of their mistake.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFG
Of course I'm not going to fall into that trap with your questions. If this was a court of law, I would not be required by a judge to answer your questions. Instead, I would be allowed to provide my own explanation in regard to the subject matter of your question - I would be able to explain myself without getting pidgeonholed by your grade school cheesy attempt to back me into a corner.
|
If you answer those simple yes or no questions, I promise I'll STFU and go away.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFG
I've said this once and I'll say it again, you piece of shit. You are the worst type of hypocrite. You have a guild mate, EMMA, who has gained 5+ tradeskill levels per night ON MULTIPLE CRAFTERS AT THE SAME TIME, each dinging levels in guild chat at various hours in the middle of the night, with that person never responding to "grats" or anything else, then logging off suddenly and logging on their main in the morning and saying "good morning", and you act like you are blind to the fact they are macroing? Why do you think this person only crafts on the TS stations in his house, and his house is never open to public access while he's crafting? Let me ask you another yes or no question here Dehah: Are you lying, or just stupid, because it can only be one of these two things? Don't accuse me me of exploiting on a technical ground while you are protecting Emma and your entire guild benefits from what he does.
|
Once again, you attack me by attacking a guild mate of mine. If you have proof of them TS botting, give it to me so I can work on getting them removed from the guild. I am not the guild leader, I can not just lobby to the guild leader to get someone guild removed when the only evidence I have are reports from players that haven't played on our server in over half a year. You accuse me of not noticing things that I wasn't around to notice, and of that, I stand guilty.
I'm sorry to bring this up Ixnay, but I'm sick and tired of your personal attacks on me, so I can't resist anymore.
Shortly after DoF was released, I left my then current guild after a Monk from Descendants left that guild and joined it. He publicly admitted and gloated about Tradeskill botting on the blackburrow forums in a thread that I know for a fact that you've read. I believe you know what post I am referring to. After he joined my guild, I started asking questions as to why we would let a well know cheater into the guild. What I uncovered was that it wasn't restricted to just him. I asked an Inquistor in the guild that crafted a lot if they tradeskill botted, they admitted to me that they did. After talking to the guild leader about whether or not that behavior was supported, I deguilded myself and was guildless for over a month. Everyone said that I wouldn't find a guild that had no botters.
In that one month time frame, I watched both the Monk, who was a publicly admitted tradeskill botter, and the Inquisitor leave my old guild and join YOUR guild: Amend. Cracatoa tried to recruit me and I told him I wouldn't join a guild with a publicly admitted tradeskill botter, he blew me off after that.
Now, are you a dipshit for not knowing that the Monk was a TS botter since I know you read the thread. Look, here is the post right here where he admitted to TS botting.
http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/e....id=5031#M5031
WHOA! What is that, a post be Ixnay two posts down REPLYING to him. You were guilded with this guy after the date of that post. You KNEW, and he publicly admitted it, and you guilded with him.
There is nothing I can do to someone if I don't have proof, just like SOE can't ban anyone without proof. I am not the guild leader, and even if I was I would not do things on a whim due to a non-guildy's accusations. Maybe Emma is a botter, maybe Emma isn't. But Emma has never said they were a botter, and I have never caught Emma botting, so my hands are tied. You on the other hand, willingly guilded with someone that you knew was a tradeskill botter.