Thoughts about the class - Page 2

kascall · 05-14-2009, 07:08 PM

Actually SK used to be in the boat we have now, maybe a lil less then us now actually but when played by a competent player did fine, enough crybabies whined and look what happened. they got the OP stick laid on em, wonder how long till they get nerfed.

Lyger · 05-14-2009, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

I think its just moreso other plate tanks are easy mode while you actually have to work your ass off as a zerker. I can 100% say this is true as a guardian because i was one, and crusaders seem even easier.

this is how i feel, easymode classes are percieved as overpowered and then people become biased to favor those classes.

not that i want an easymode class but i don't want other classes to be either.

they gave paladins amends master 2 choice, SKs have sacrament, guards have reinforcement(probably could be improved to override all the retards who keep popping sacrament) and zerkers have gibe. gibe only works when the other tanks will allow it to work, all of our snaps and force targets don't do shit against the other tank classes when they start playing ignorantly, making us look more stupid for not being able to snatch them back.

Balkolth · 05-14-2009, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onedustinone

sigh...
Berserkers got alot from tso, honestly.
The ONLY thing that we could use a slight upgrade on is our hit rates...

If you can AE tank, you can ST tank. If you cant you are doing something wrong.

If your getting your shit pushed in in groups/raids, get better healers or gear, and learn to use your temps better. You really shouldnt ever have to use defensive stance.

We are in NO way gimp tanks, just gimp players blaming the class for there skill.

Truth.

Migg · 07-08-2009, 05:56 PM

Welp i can say this.. Im a zerker on nagafen server although this is my "first eq2" char, and is only lvl66, i pvp 80% of the time (80% might be a understatement) so my info/opinion might be useless.

And i gotta say we are wayyyyy underpowered compaired to the knight classes. Im totally mastered out on all my CA and Taunts. I cant hold agro from a SK thats for sure, even when in reallly working and trying for it. "i havnt tried with paladins snice they normally arent on the freeport side" Althought i can 1v1 them and actully win. (but thats just a PVP thing)

It actully makes the game a little unenjoyable.. knowing these other classes got it so easy and have multiple OP buttons.
Juggernaught isnt even that good, we need to take a mitigation loss, like WTF other classes dont have big backfires to their abilitys

Zerker class for the most part is fine i guess...???? if sony could just tone down the retard OP classes maybe we would be looked at if we were a useful class.

But... heres something to add Even tho we might be gimp compaired to others. In my tier...
Only 3 people have the "Master Title" Highest title any of our tier has (lvls 60-70)

Mine... Which was earned (Freeport)

A troub earned (who recently leveled to 76 hes going for 80) (Qeynos)

A Warden (i believe he earned his, he isnt bad thats for sure, but never logs off so he doesnt lose infamy) (Qeynos)

So i guess that tells you, if your on the ball, you can be pretty dang good, but im mainly looking at a pvp stand point, put compaired to the other knights/tanks, were pretty much gimpy.
(posted 5pm eastern july 8th)

FlyingWrench · 07-09-2009, 10:57 AM

Get to lvl 80.....get myth.....get crit mit gear....then re-read your post

Migg · 07-09-2009, 12:28 PM

Aye i know 80s is totally different, but before those levels... why must we suffer all those tiers? I dont expect to be top op class of the game, but its really 7tiers of horse crap..

Lyger · 07-09-2009, 01:56 PM

then you need to learn to play the class. i have rerolled and i will say it isn't as easy at it was when we had 76% double attack from stamina line but tanking and soloing as a zerk isn't as bad as you make it seem until you get the endgame gear.

i ran a beta buffed zerk(no mythical) through kurns tower with a group full of mythicals and i had no issues, i was also competing versus teams from other servers. sure we didn't do as well as some groups but we also didn't have any issue killing anything in our way either.

Yzyh · 07-10-2009, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kascall

Yep i was a guardian from the start of EQ2 through the early days of RoK before people we really raiding in rok yet. Ive got a decently geared SK alt as well and i can atest we work for our agro compaired to those two classes..

this statement mean nothing.

At the start of EQ2 berseker was top1-2 DPS class even in raids nobody wanted anything but a zerker as tank. I mean come on they where destroying even warlock DPS on AoE fights. DOes it mean they still that OP . Hell no.

Same for guardian their main complain right now si their lack of AoE aggro.

Serraphim · 07-10-2009, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Migg

Welp i can say this.. Im a zerker on nagafen server although this is my "first eq2" char, and is only lvl66, i pvp 80% of the time (80% might be a understatement) so my info/opinion might be useless.

And i gotta say we are wayyyyy underpowered compaired to the knight classes. Im totally mastered out on all my CA and Taunts. I cant hold agro from a SK thats for sure, even when in reallly working and trying for it. "i havnt tried with paladins snice they normally arent on the freeport side" Althought i can 1v1 them and actully win. (but thats just a PVP thing)

It actully makes the game a little unenjoyable.. knowing these other classes got it so easy and have multiple OP buttons.
Juggernaught isnt even that good, we need to take a mitigation loss, like WTF other classes dont have big backfires to their abilitys

Zerker class for the most part is fine i guess...???? if sony could just tone down the retard OP classes maybe we would be looked at if we were a useful class.

But... heres something to add Even tho we might be gimp compaired to others. In my tier...
Only 3 people have the "Master Title" Highest title any of our tier has (lvls 60-70)

Mine... Which was earned (Freeport)

A troub earned (who recently leveled to 76 hes going for 80) (Qeynos)

A Warden (i believe he earned his, he isnt bad thats for sure, but never logs off so he doesnt lose infamy) (Qeynos)

So i guess that tells you, if your on the ball, you can be pretty dang good, but im mainly looking at a pvp stand point, put compaired to the other knights/tanks, were pretty much gimpy.
(posted 5pm eastern july 8th)

You really think that your PvP title has anything to do with the class' balance? Or your ability to play it? Give your head a shake.
I dont know if you got the memo, titles didnt mean a whole lot before th LU, they mean shit all now. Lulz

Migg · 07-11-2009, 03:23 PM

Eh dont think they mean much either, but when you still log off and still keep ur title and give people a run for their money i guess it isnt that bad? I didnt go leech in LS/KP to get mine. And im not a 80 where its common.

Lol i know your a zerker etc. but i dont believe you remember the lower tiers were like, and 40% of the time my crew has no healer, once in a great while we have a templar but normally its 1 Inquiz.

Anywho im just giving out input from what ive noticed for the past 7 tiers, your right though the titles dont mean shit but i figure id throw it out there.

Ive been trying to send you a tell ingame too :P i wanted ur zerker input on how our AAs should go for pvp etc.