Thoughts about the class - Page 3

Serraphim · 07-11-2009, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Migg

Ive been trying to send you a tell ingame too :P i wanted ur zerker input on how our AAs should go for pvp etc.

I'm now Exile.

malos · 07-13-2009, 12:17 AM

If anything I think non myth'ed zerkers are not near the aoe that the non myth'ed crusaders can dish out. Crusaders have many options in aa's and ca's that allow for better aoe damage and aggro.

I would like to see open wounds be like a swashbucklers hurricane and it give the zerker 55% aoe auto attack (until cancled) without the haste of course.

Now once a zerker gets their mythical then it could allow open wounds to become 100% aoe auto attack when the mythical is equiped.

Lyger · 07-13-2009, 04:44 PM

then it becomes even more useless to mythicalled toons, it's a delicate balancing act.

*Hardain* · 07-13-2009, 05:30 PM

And with Agi tree AA you'd get 100% without myth.

malos · 07-13-2009, 08:35 PM

Humm good point there. I forgot about the ole agility line since I never used it.

Xalmat · 07-14-2009, 04:17 AM

Personally I think the Berserker class is fine. It's the other fighter classes (mostly Crusaders) that are out of whack right now. A Paladin holds easymode aggro with Amends, and a SK hold easymode aggro due to sheer DPS and extra overpowered taunts (Grave Sacrament mainly).

Tumor73 · 07-14-2009, 12:21 PM

This will change, just wait. From what I am hearing the fighter revamp is coming with the next expansion.

Too bad that the next exp is 8 months out, and AION Beta is so fucking awesome. I pray they do something to revitalize the game. And no I dont think that the Shard of Love will do it for me. I know that GU 51 and 52 were utter failures in terms of raid content. The new x2 and x4 sucks balls, and the new instances a person can only run so many times until it just gets realy old.

But there is light at the end of the tunnel. Hopefully they will do it right and the new taunt crit mechanic will pay dividends. At Fanfair they said they will be combining many of our buffs in to the stances (so we wont have to use all our concentration slots), and some of our CAs will get threat added to them. In addition threat will actually mean something in regards to mob resists.

Lyger · 07-14-2009, 03:20 PM

zerk class is fine, what worries me is the simple fact that you have to be an underpowered class that will become overpowered and then left for a year. the zerk having always been a decent class will never really be balanced with the rest. we do ok but we never will be stellar or have a free spot in a raid, which is how it is for some classes and it shouldn't be(that is why i get worked up when it comes to balance).

Balkolth · 07-14-2009, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lyger

zerk class is fine, what worries me is the simple fact that you have to be an underpowered class that will become overpowered and then left for a year. the zerk having always been a decent class will never really be balanced with the rest. we do ok but we never will be stellar or have a free spot in a raid, which is how it is for some classes and it shouldn't be(that is why i get worked up when it comes to balance).

Zerk class was fine in ROK.... In TSO we are fucking beast. IMO the proc nerf gave us an edge over crusaders. It makes me LOL when people say the zerk class is in any way inferior to other tank classes.

Ower · 07-14-2009, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yzyh

this statement mean nothing.

At the start of EQ2 berseker was top1-2 DPS class even in raids nobody wanted anything but a zerker as tank. I mean come on they where destroying even warlock DPS on AoE fights. DOes it mean they still that OP . Hell no.

Same for guardian their main complain right now si their lack of AoE aggro.

I dont think i have ever heard a decent guard complain about our aoe aggro. We arnt aoe tanks.