Quote:
Originally Posted by Gage
Never heard of Trumak I take it? I just don't understand why people think its gasp! crazy that people chose a tank class to tank.
|
I am well aware that Trumak had tanked every encounter in RoK on his Bruiser, but I don't ever remember him saying that he preferred tanking over dps, or that raid tanking was the reason he decided to play bruiser.
My Point is, that if we had to choose, most bruisers would choose a dps role over a tank role. I challenge you to find ANY bruiser who wants to raid tank and not have as much dps. A similar geared and skilled guardian will always be the better tanking choice.
There are too many tank classes in this game as it is. I'f sony wants to nerf tank dps because some pure dps classes simply can't keep up, then I'd rather bruisers be labeled a dps class and try to avoid the next inevitable nerf bat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gage
Everything you say you like about brawlers would be overpowered if your dps was increased btw.
|
I do not want to bring things out of balance at all. Basicly i'm just saying that dps is my favorits aspect of the class, and if we do see a new fighter revamp I hope the dps portion of bruisers won't get hurt to bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gage
Ya. I'm referring to the FD, the solo ability, the ways to get to 100% avoidance, the ability to shield the MT from damage, the snap aggro tools, the ability to tank an 88x4 when the MT goes down.
All of that stuff would have to be erased in order to make the brawler classes a DPS class.
|
I don't think these things would need to be erased so much as maybe retooled to be a bit less potent. Many of the abilities you listed, other dps classes have some version of those same things as well. You wouldn't have to erase any of that stuff, just retool it. Maybe longer recast FD, maybe only 50% avoid temps, things of that sort.
Let me say first and foremost though, that I am pretty much happy with the Bruiser class as it is now. I'm just concerned about the eventual nerfage.