The fix to crusaders being left in the dust for DPS... - Page 40

jfantasy · 05-03-2008, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orochan

Ehh, I guess in VP+ guards > zerks but tbh in the lower end raids I didn't really notice a diff between a guard and zerk tanking. Could just be me though, and I don't when aerylik said it but I know he did in some post on this site.

u need to learn class more.

Orochan · 05-03-2008, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boli

Guards > all other tanks reguardless of tier.

No one argued or disputed that, next time read the post, my point is atm the other tanks are just becoming less and less viable ( some not even viable at all ) which is just retarded in design.

Ower · 05-03-2008, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orochan

No one argued or disputed that, next time read the post, my point is atm the other tanks are just becoming less and less viable ( some not even viable at all ) which is just retarded in design.

Yes. There are to many tank classes to make this game balanced. Since you dont need more than 3 max really.

Orochan · 05-03-2008, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfantasy

u need to learn class more.

I've never been in a raid with a pally mt, so I'll accept that pally = zerk for tankage, but then again I was more arguing for SK viability then pallies. /shrug

boli · 05-03-2008, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orochan

I've never been in a raid with a pally mt, so I'll accept that pally = zerk for tankage, but then again I was more arguing for SK viability then pallies. /shrug

You need to get out more often :P

Tho saying that you can;t have a BAD crusaer MT a raid ... and from my experiance crusaders are either ruddy shite... or bloody brillent... there is little middle ground.