Redhenna wrote:
Grimwell wrote:...but his information is inconsistently wrong...
Is that an odd way of saying he is sometimes right, sometimes wrong?
No. It means that not only is he wrong on the ones I know the true counts for, but that he's also wrong by wildly varying degrees. IE: He's not 10% off on all the games I know, that would be consistent. Instead he's wrong by a different margin for each and every game; which makes his numbers useless even as a rule of thumb measure. If he was consistently wrong (even if it was like 50% wrong) then you could at least say "well, the ratios between the games are still somewhat useful as a reference." since he's not, you can't.
hopefully that made more sense.
LINK