Quote:
Originally Posted by stivan
The problem is we will be supporting oil producting - which is ruining our country. We depend too much on it. The oil companies have too much influence in our government. There are other alternatives to a short term plan - look at the "Pickensplan" that Cracatoa linked.
|
"The oil companies have to much influence in our government."
I get it now, your a hippie and will not succumb to reason. You don't care about energy and its costs and efficiency. Its simply some perverted crusade.
First off, if you think "Pickensplan" is a short term plan you are absolutely insane. To retrofit close to half a billion vehicles to be ran off of natural gas as well as build thousands of 400ft tall wind turbines is going to happen over night. From a vehicle standpoint it will take years for consumers to phase out their vehicles.
Furthermore, Wind Powers ultimate failure is in order to harness it the generator must be inanimate. This completely rules out vehicles, which is why the plan relies so heavily on natural gas as an alternative to oil. So wind power's main competitor are things such as nuclear, coal, solar, and the most similar hydro electric (b/c nuclear, coal, and solar at least have the possiblity of being transported with a movable object as fuel whereas hydro cannot).
Don't get me wrong I love wind power, but there are obvious limitations to it, and when comparing it to oil its a completely different breed.
In this plan the limitation is obviously understood, which is why its not even mentioned as transportable enrgy. Instead they use natural gas which is just totally mindboggling b/c the means of getting natural gas is almost identical to that of oil. Shale = heat up rock and get oil and natural gas. Drill = Drill in ground get oil and natural gas. So that part makes absolutely 0 sense to me.