Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminator
Markos enlisted in the Army from age 18 to 21 but did not serve in combat. Without injury or ailment over that short period of youth to test the weaknesses of the system, his opinion on the system is as good as anyone's and didn't quite legitimize his random insult.
|
The former congressman was hinting as though he spoke for veterans in regards to the weakness of tri-care.
Marcos, a veteran, took offense at this coming from a man who skirted the draft for a war he outspokenly supported and proceeded to call BS on the statement. Legitimate in your eyes or not i see no issue with it.
Weather or not he served in combat is a lame ass point, he swore an oath this former congressman craftily avoided.
I've seen friends use tri-care after sustaining serious injury before & after discharge from active service and used it personally for minor stuff while enlisted.
Got a notice from where i work that medicaid may cover prescriptions more fully from our insurance company and the next week notice that premiums are again going up. The co-pay is reasonable but they don't cover preventative care at all, not to mention dental.
Should i lose my job due to an extended medical leave, they will only pay up to so much before i get cut off and then i'll be shit out of luck. I personally would love to have tri-care back. Perhaps there are some legitimate horror stories out there about it, but i haven't heard them.
This doesn't really mean that tri-care is a solution on a national scale, but to say it is inadequate for those who have it is nonsense.
Certainly medical liabilty issues are different in the private sector, but tri-care also covers retirees, spouses and children who are civilians effectively. Beyond that i simply haven't done the research to have much of an informed opinion tbh.