Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminator
Getting closer and closer to the grand dilemma, which is that insecurity causes people to address every single contrary post and burn out, otherwise silence admits defeat, thus abandoning one's fan base and forever dooming oneself to becoming a wide-open laughingstock never to be taken seriously ever again. Right?
|
The issue here is more that once you start moderating, where do you stop?
Look at what happened to Germany post-WW2 (not invoking Godwin here). They made Nazi sympathizing illegal, and banned the swastika and things like that. The people said "Fine. That stuff's bad." Then they started banning movies, tv shows, and video games that were "amoral" or had "excessive violence," and it gets worse every single day because they're already sliding down a slippery slope that ends in a punji pit.
Compare the US, which, for all its flaws, got the censorship laws right. We protect assholes like neo-Nazis and other hate groups because the logic goes "Hey, if that retard is allowed to speak his mind freely, there will be precedent when I have something important to say."
Once we start saying "OK, let's moderate people like Calbiyum, who post ridiculous off topic things," what's to stop us from going "Well, what about people who post a flame in a serious thread and reference another post out of the blue?" "What about people who post viewpoints contrary to the majority in the thread?" "What about people who are excessively negative?"
Where does it end?