NDA Lifted - Let the Bitching begin - Page 3

Sharakari · 10-31-2008, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AricaJade

60 points is enough to spend. there r 7 things in each tree that u can spend in. each tree except for the general, has a "finisher" that unlocks once u spend 10 points in the tree. the "finisher" requires 1 point. the fury tree is the only one that requires 2 for the "finisher" because it's the stances, each stance is 1 point each.

tso tree goes

general --> priest --> druid --> fury

10 points in each to unlock the next

then u can go back & fill in the rest of ur points in the previous trees after u unlock them all, or can fill in as u go, whatever u choose.

Thanks AJ and gang... you are all always a wealth of knowledge!

Diknak · 10-31-2008, 01:34 PM

I'm not too disappointed with the AAs, but I would have liked to see more utility for mage groups again. I would have liked to see some sort of crit booster or something else besides just more int that we don't need. I like the idea of having stances, so that will be pretty cool.

Widem · 10-31-2008, 03:26 PM

I like the hp gain on the int/power buff, but how many hp is it exactly?

regarding previous coding errors...does the penalty on the stances add from the base amount ignoring any other speed buffs?

overall it looks like they pretty much designed a tree that says reroll a mage or quit.

AricaJade · 10-31-2008, 03:33 PM

it's just a lil over 400 hp for max points

pagansaint · 10-31-2008, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phrozen

You are a retarded fucking spastic. The only thing that could save the Inquisitor DPS is this increase in crit damage that still isn't on beta to try out.

Because maintainable flurry with a higher hite rate doesn't help? It was up almost all the time for me against debuffed orange cons on Beta. Was hitting 90 something percent DA, 110+ Crit and 160+ haste/dps mod as an Inquisitor, so unless RoK damage increasing abilities, armor and debuffs were scaled far back in the last week on beta, you're just throwing a fit because the Flurry buff was nerfed or AAs didn't give even more DPS buffs other than the near completely maintainable almost CoB level damage proc.

So please by all means, QQ away.

Phrozen · 10-31-2008, 04:26 PM

There have been numerous Inquisitors worth a damn, unlike yourself, testing these out on beta-buffed and RoK Avatar geared characters, all signs point the same way.

Nothing has changed since I first went into beta on 23/09/08, till now, the only possible hope of getting any decent DPS out of the Inquisitor class will be the change to the offensive stance to increase the amount an Inquisitor can crit by, but since that isn't in beta yet, it's hard to test.

I can more or less hit the figures you quote now, without the increases to Yalup and Tenacity respectively, which is what Avirodar was saying in his post on the Beta Boards, that people like He, I and others with the best gear available will have little to no gains over current stats apart from Flurry... Wohooo!

Your arguement about hitrates is laughable, maybe at the start of RoK, but not now.

Btw, true order of priest DPS:

Fury > Mystic > Templar > Inquisitor. Not what this blithering idiot is saying.

serum321 · 10-31-2008, 05:12 PM

Any chance we can get a ss of the new legendary set?

Sioned · 10-31-2008, 05:43 PM

It's brown and ugly as hell

serum321 · 10-31-2008, 05:56 PM

ZOMG plz, plz, plz Sioned, I'll give you hearts!

<3 <3 <3
<3 <3 <3

And I'm not worried about your appearance, I'm more interested in your stats.

Sioned · 10-31-2008, 06:42 PM

I'm not going to be on tonight - going from work to a Halloween party - sorry