Striikor

What versions of Regex does ACT support? I am trying to capture autoattack misses and exempt CA misses. as CA misses are prefaced by 'with'{CA name} the following regex should work but mine does not :{

.*YOU try to (slash|crush|pierce) (?!with) (.+) (miss|deflects|parries|blocks|dodges|riposites)\.$

The flavor used does not seem to support the (?!) negative lookahead.

It is certainly possible that I have it formatted incorrectly but if so I don't see it. Is there a negative lookahead for the flavor of regex used by ACT?

Illuminator

All indications are that it's the built-in .NET version (System.Text.RegularExpressions).

You have a space before and after the with, which means if "with" isn't there, it'll still be looking for two consecutive spaces.

__________________
Oh shit I just had a memwipe, why is retarded uncle Roger still designing raids for this game again?
Some players might bot against encounters but it seems like he bots the encounter design!

Sparks

You probably want this:

It's fairly inefficient, though.

edit

Need to add in 'misses' if you want to capture missed double attacks as well.

__________________

A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.

Striikor

Doh! Thanks, both of you, Did not notice the second space and you are you are right it will not catch a the misses of the double attack. Thanks for the quick responses!