Exploit, A Definition? - Page 6

Bodhi · 11-14-2006, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinski

It completely is technically. In fact, the dev didn't even think about the fact that there was water in the room while I was with Eidolon beta testing Tarinax. He didn't realize it until we were testing him that water = knockbacks made pointless.

Yup. This hasn't been addressed since t5 if I'm correct. It was always thought to be an exploit. So now how many of you goodie two shoes can say "i've never spoited, how dare thou". Hypocrites, and a good example which shows the concept of exploiting is relative and really only a fact when either the masses, or the ones in power, deem something to be a sploit.

Derrik · 11-14-2006, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bodhi

Yup. This hasn't been addressed since t5 if I'm correct. It was always thought to be an exploit. So now how many of you goodie two shoes can say "i've never spoited, how dare thou". Hypocrites, and a good example which shows the concept of exploiting is relative and really only a fact when either the masses, or the ones in power, deem something to be a sploit.

So where do we draw the line B? Is standing with your back to a tree to kill the nameds in the FBSS HQ an exploit? I think the point of this thread was to define what we felt was an exploit. Your earlier definition was "whatever floats your boat" implying everthing is fair game. Now you are going to lecture us on how pulling T into the water is using a sploit? C'mon bro. Pick a side. I don't think anyone is saying their stuff don't stink. My definition of an exploit would be taking advantage of known bugs like broken zone reuse timers AND raid instances that allow more than raid group inside (Like AoA x4 once did and a couple of the crap poser wannabee l33T omgpwn3d guilds on my server took advantage of to kill Talendor and Gorenaire). Stuff like dat.