Go Back   EQ2Flames Forum > General Discussion > General Gameplay

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-29-2008, 11:19 AM  
Regular
 
Character: Feldon
Server: Butcherblock

Posts: 125
Photos: (0)

Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

I see. And to jump into the conjurer consolidation post, I don't always use flame shield either. It breaks invisy every time the tank takes damage. In overland zones, I am less likely to use it.
__________________
The 240 seconds between mob respawns in Castle Mistmoore makes me want to drown kittens. Why does it need to be so fucking fast?
feldon30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 11:20 AM  
Done and Done.
 

Posts: 6,046
Photos: (66)

Send a message via AIM to Laodaron
Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

I'm not gonna quote all of you, but I agree with Kall. Make all buffs and pets and diety pets a .5 cast time, and there is no need for consolidation.

What most of you don't understand is that you probably play a class that has 3 buffs that you can cast while you run. Your opinion is worthless in the grand scheme. Mages and priests that have 10+ buffs to cast several of which are over 10 seconds each will begin to understand.

I completely with shortening the length, but the mechanic like it is makes me not even want to raid because of the amount of time during a raid I spend casting buffs.
Laodaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 12:10 PM  
Regular
 
Character: Serum
Server: Permafrost

Posts: 248
Photos: (0)

Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

I am a fury and it seems we have more buffs than other priests because i'm usually the last one still casting and I can still cast all of my buffs well before the 2m rev sickness has worn off so no, you don't need 1 friggin' buff button.
serum321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:26 PM  
Coercers don't need Rohypnol
 
Daractoom's Avatar
 
Character: Why People!
Guild: Do you muppets
Server: Still Play EQ2

Posts: 143
Photos: (2)

Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

So basically you want it so anyone dying midfight has no impact on the encounter because they get rebuffed in one click or your dps doesn't suffer because you can resummon your pet/buffs in under a second.

So in your perfect world T9 raiding would be only having one hotbar which includes yell/autoattack/sprint and HO start

Last edited by Daractoom; 04-29-2008 at 01:28 PM.
Daractoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:31 PM  
L337 Poster
 
gungo's Avatar
 
Character: Gungo
Guild: Elysium
Server: Crushbone

Posts: 1,966
Photos: (0)

Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

anyone remeber the new dynamic map system revamp due with the release of RoK.

Wtf did that go?

and the guild halls and skeletal revamp were never given a date. Those have always been long term projects.

the shadow system and spell consolidation just disappeared however.

The mythical update was only a recently announced project.

kurn's tower also was another not given a date

Last edited by gungo; 04-29-2008 at 01:37 PM.
gungo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:37 PM  
Fucking SICK of spell resists
 
Illuminator's Avatar
 
Character: Aleraku/Alaedraa
Server: Blackburrow

Posts: 8,258
Photos: (0)

Send a message via AIM to Illuminator Send a message via MSN to Illuminator Send a message via Yahoo to Illuminator
Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miroh View Post
Easy mode is 4TL....its why EQ2 is where it is now.
Yet it doesn't seem to be hurting WoW's success in any way...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kall View Post
Make all group buffs .5s cast time. Problem solved.

Spell consolidation is just as dumb as having group buffs take 2-3s to cast each.
I rather they simply didn't drop target on death.
__________________
80/140 Wizard, 80/140 Illusionist, 80/140 Warden, 80/128 Troubador, etc.



HA HA fuck you, Roger. And don't vote for Obama.

Last edited by Illuminator; 04-29-2008 at 01:40 PM.
Illuminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:38 PM  
Nobody
 

Posts: 7,829
Photos: (0)

Send a message via ICQ to Pinski Send a message via AIM to Pinski Send a message via MSN to Pinski Send a message via Yahoo to Pinski
Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

There has to be a penalty for dying. Rebuffing is the penalty.

Remove recasts on any perma buffs, problem solved. But to not have them drop when you die? What is this, no penalty for dying? No.
__________________
Pinski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:42 PM  
Anyone for Mob Tennis?
 
Character: Irulana
Guild: Legion Of Steel
Server: Kithicor

Posts: 218
Photos: (13)

Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

You know what, forget it!

I was gonna try and get this list together to post on the official forum but since you guys have turned this into yet another pointless debate I really don't think it's worth the effort.

In the back of every magazine there is usually a section on what is coming in the next issue right? Well I can't imagine that people would continue to pay for their subscriptions if all they get month after month is exactly the same edition of the magazine with none of the stuff promissed in the previous month's copies.

I use the above analagy because we pay a monthly subscription, we get the "coming soon" crap from SOE and yet time and time again we get nothing new for our money, just the same thing with the occasional bug fix here, a new bug introduced there.

I would have liked to give them a list of their to date missing "coming soons" in an effort to point out to them why so many of their subscribers are dropping from game, however yet again you people have to have a pissing contest about every little thing so forget it, just forget it.
__________________


Warlocks do it with more than one mob at a time
Irulana is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:42 PM  
Fucking SICK of spell resists
 
Illuminator's Avatar
 
Character: Aleraku/Alaedraa
Server: Blackburrow

Posts: 8,258
Photos: (0)

Send a message via AIM to Illuminator Send a message via MSN to Illuminator Send a message via Yahoo to Illuminator
Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

Stated before and stated again. The penalty for playing is casting the same permanent buffs on the same targets repeatedly. The penalty for dying is starting the encounter from scratch.

Wait, why are we penalizing playing again?
__________________
80/140 Wizard, 80/140 Illusionist, 80/140 Warden, 80/128 Troubador, etc.



HA HA fuck you, Roger. And don't vote for Obama.
Illuminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:48 PM  
Nobody
 

Posts: 7,829
Photos: (0)

Send a message via ICQ to Pinski Send a message via AIM to Pinski Send a message via MSN to Pinski Send a message via Yahoo to Pinski
Default Re: EQ2 Devs, just a bunch of teasing B"*tards?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irulana View Post
In the back of every magazine there is usually a section on what is coming in the next issue right? Well I can't imagine that people would continue to pay for their subscriptions if all they get month after month is exactly the same edit
What magazines do you read? The back is full of advertisements with a page from some older player describing their perfect XI in the magazine I read, nothing about what's coming next month.
__________________
Pinski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Sponsor Ads


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0