 |
|
05-02-2008, 04:52 PM
|
|
|
Visitor
Character: Meerah
Guild: Bloodsiege
Server: Permafrost
Posts: 18
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
After reading the in-testing feedback on soe's forums, I was in disbelief. This is the coercer 'fix'? Don't get me wrong, I fully believe they were in need of some loving, but.. they are reporting t1 dps on test and illusionists are getting a nice boost in dps??
I'm not sure where balancing went.. out the window or out the door. Will the devs ever quit until every single class is t1 dps and there is very little to separate the classes, except the type of gear they wear? Hi, I'm a plate, clothy, leather, chain t1 dps. Buffs? De-buffs? What are those?? Leave me alone.. I'm DPS!!
I just don't understand.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 05:34 PM
|
|
|
Sha La La La Lee
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meerah
After reading the in-testing feedback on soe's forums, I was in disbelief. This is the coercer 'fix'? Don't get me wrong, I fully believe they were in need of some loving, but.. they are reporting t1 dps on test and illusionists are getting a nice boost in dps??
I'm not sure where balancing went.. out the window or out the door. Will the devs ever quit until every single class is t1 dps and there is very little to separate the classes, except the type of gear they wear? Hi, I'm a plate, clothy, leather, chain t1 dps. Buffs? De-buffs? What are those?? Leave me alone.. I'm DPS!!
I just don't understand.
|
I'm confused, how the fuck are Illusionists getting a boost in DPS? Can you please explain. Thanks.
And obviously this is the first part of the coercer fix, and they'll scale it back to meet the actual needs.
__________________
Picked her up on a Friday night, Sha la la la lee, yeah
I knew everything gonna be alright, Sha la la la lee, yeah
Sha la la la lee
I asked her 'where do you wanna go?', Sha la la la lee, yeah
Well we went someplace, I don't know, Sha la la la lee, yeah
Sha la la la lee
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 05:43 PM
|
|
|
Regular
Character: Mareth
Guild: Boogie Knights
Server: Splitpaw
Posts: 363
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
This is like one of those "dream update notes" people used to write up ages ago, in vain hope.
Seriously though, they're fixing Surging Tempest. Wtf! I almost suspect they're not making a new expansion and are just out of stuff to do at the office!
__________________
Raiding EFP on daily basis.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 06:10 PM
|
|
|
Wish I had a tail
Character: Sakua
Server: Blackburrow
Posts: 166
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meerah
After reading the in-testing feedback on soe's forums, I was in disbelief. This is the coercer 'fix'? Don't get me wrong, I fully believe they were in need of some loving, but.. they are reporting t1 dps on test and illusionists are getting a nice boost in dps??
I'm not sure where balancing went.. out the window or out the door. Will the devs ever quit until every single class is t1 dps and there is very little to separate the classes, except the type of gear they wear? Hi, I'm a plate, clothy, leather, chain t1 dps. Buffs? De-buffs? What are those?? Leave me alone.. I'm DPS!!
I just don't understand.
|
The only Illusionists getting a boost are the ones that were too lazy or too stupid to use Volatile Magic before. The rest of us are getting a nerf. Probably not as much of one as some would like to see...
__________________
My toon is a chick rat, but I'm not.
80 Illy - Lady Sakua Hamham the Fox (Blackburrow)
|
|
|
05-05-2008, 01:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meerah
Will the devs ever quit until every single class is t1 dps
|
Ooooo....are bards going to become t1 dps? That'd be sweet.
|
|
|
05-05-2008, 01:24 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orochan
Not really, I gave you a pretty straightforward response. I didn't expect a decent reply from you though, and I was right, I just got a bunch of words piled up in a piece of shit paragraph trying to form some sort of insult.
Your sentence doesn't even make sense.
Is this what you're like on crack? - WTF does crack have to do with eq2? I'm sorry but I don't know any crackhead that plays eq2.
Sorry, but I don't have time to decode whatever whining you've done in this one, - Ahh the whining argument, Look if your just gonna shrug off every complaint as whining then just stfu, I brought up pretty decent points that most people agree on ( I.E not many people are too fond of the cure change ) Just because you finally get to get into deep chardok, doesn't mean your any less shitty of a player. I bet your one of those people who thinks it's ok that fableds drop off heroic nameds too.
It's called risk vs reward.
but I'm sure it's just more whining - Didn't you already conclude I was whining in the previous sentence? Damn talk about short term memory.
GG mate, try better next time.
|
You don't play the game anymore, therefore you don't get to complain about anything. Everything you post is a whine. And, by the way, there are no risks in video games.
|
|
|
05-05-2008, 03:15 AM
|
|
|
Lil Newbie
Character: Bhow
Guild: Mojo Rising
Server: Oasis
Posts: 2
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Quote:
Conjuror
Golem pets have now mastered the skill of walking silently.
|
Its about time. No more jackhammer following me everywhere I go.
|
|
|
05-05-2008, 10:32 AM
|
|
|
Apples
Character: Somewhere
Guild: Nowhere
Server: Anywhere
Posts: 1,275
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming Homo
You don't play the game anymore, therefore you don't get to complain about anything. Everything you post is a whine. And, by the way, there are no risks in video games.
|
Correction, I play the game until AOC comes out. Can't say I won't give eq2 one final chance.
Risk vs reward is a general idea in video games, there are plenty of risk in video games, I suggest you look up Hardcore mode in diablo 2, perfect example of risk vs reward, though that is an extreme example, my point still remains that there are plenty of ways to implement risk vs reward, and chardok was one of them.
You had to risk dying, and starting over from the beginning and that soko post was in a sense your reward. You can actually compare the soko post in chardok to checkpoints in platform games, and what SOE did is give the player all the checkpoints right from the beginning.
It's such a stupid un-needed change too, the sole fact that they put this in is to make the game easier, no other way around it sorry, and this game is already way too easy, but it's ok sooner or late you'll realize SOE just wants your money lol.
So your argument fails....again.
Keep trying though I'm loving how you fail each post.
__________________
|
|
|
05-05-2008, 11:00 AM
|
|
|
Visitor
Character: Ryilan
Guild: Paragons of Valour
Server: Runnyeye
Posts: 16
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orochan
You had to risk dying, and starting over from the beginning and that soko post was in a sense your reward. You can actually compare the soko post in chardok to checkpoints in platform games, and what SOE did is give the player all the checkpoints right from the beginning.
|
Problem is, this works well in solo and/or linear games where you have to do the risky stuff to get to the next checkpoint.
But in EQ2, you have the option to get a conjurer to summon you down. Or you could be a tinkerer and summon yourself to it. Or you could follow a grp down, or maybe some other way, as long as you got past the first gate, you are more or less set.
So the 'risk' part was already very situational, ranging from no risk to some risk; the only thing it comes down to is what you have at hand to attempt it at the time you want to get the post.
Then comes the other side of the coin: grps going to deep Chardok/CoK, but you need sokokar access, or you are out of luck. So how are you going to get it without a grp? Seems you need to do it in one way mentioned above.
|
|
|
05-05-2008, 11:05 AM
|
|
|
Regular
Character: Benjiyardo
Server: Crushbone
Posts: 228
|
Re: Test Update Notes: April 30/08
Doesn't matter much anyway. If you're not retarded you can invis to the post without aggroing a single thing anyway.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|