Mystic, Warden or Fury? - Page 3

Diknak · 10-22-2008, 01:39 PM

I have a level 80 fury and he is very easy to solo with. I don't really have problems finding groups since PUGs usually aren't real picky, but I know I would have a hard time making him a full time raider since you only need one in the raid for the mage group.

Azleya, in your signature, is that supposed to be a string on the bow blowing in the wind? You know that strings on bows are taut, right? It would kind of defeat the whole purpose of the bow if the string was loose like that.

Nugan · 10-22-2008, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diknak

I have a level 80 fury and he is very easy to solo with. I don't really have problems finding groups since PUGs usually aren't real picky, but I know I would have a hard time making him a full time raider since you only need one in the raid for the mage group.

Azleya, in your signature, is that supposed to be a string on the bow blowing in the wind? You know that strings on bows are taut, right? It would kind of defeat the whole purpose of the bow if the string was loose like that.

As for your comment of a fury in the mage group.... Why why why why why would anyone purposely pick a Fury for mage group healer?

Now as far as Azleya's sig goes.... I believe it's meant to be a large continuous cumshot.

Diknak · 10-22-2008, 03:01 PM

umm, Furies give nice int bonus? I can't think of a better healer for a mage group. Besides, I don't decide our raid force, that is the decision of our guild/raid leader, and he does a great job with the raid setup.

Nugan · 10-22-2008, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diknak

umm, Furies give nice int bonus? I can't think of a better healer for a mage group. Besides, I don't decide our raid force, that is the decision of our guild/raid leader, and he does a great job with the raid setup.

Inquisitor, Templar, Mystic, Fury, Defiler, Warden in that order tbh.

Furies give nice INT bonus? Yeah if your casters are naked. This has been gone over so many times by now I'm surprised anyone could possibly post that Furies are 'best' for the mage group. (well shit, for any group at that!)

serum321 · 10-22-2008, 03:21 PM

Yeah, furies int bonus means nothing to casters now

Only time it could help is if a wizard is specced for manaburn. Only utility furies offer now is our single target melee dps buff.

quasigenx · 10-22-2008, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by matack

Now this is assuming same players skill level, AA's, gear and all that?

Out of those three (Fury, Warden, Mystic), it would be Mystic for sure.

Vegaxe · 10-22-2008, 05:30 PM

A fury benefits the most by being in a mage group... but a fury in its current form does not bring anything to benefit a mage group.

I would have to say that in a raid scenario the picking would probably go mystic, fury, warden... wardens are pretty gimp currently as well, trade off being a fury can dish out dps.

Krista · 10-22-2008, 06:12 PM

If you have a choice between those 3, scrap it and level a templar. As of TSO, they're the only healer you'll need for anything, except a defiler in the MT group mainly for buffs, and that's about it (and maybe a ward if the templar isn't warding all that often).

Pinski · 10-22-2008, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krista

If you have a choice between those 3, scrap it and level a templar. As of RoK, they're the only healer you'll need for anything, except 2 shaman in the Tank groups for buffs, wards, and debuffs.

Fixed.

Even in TSO you'll want Shaman, since Templars only have 1 ward on a 30s recast. If they had more, well then you wouldn't need Shaman for anything but buffing.

Azleya · 10-22-2008, 06:26 PM

LOL yes I'm pretty sure I'm aware bow strings are taut. My sig is the artistic creation of our very emo former guardian Feeble. Basically as far as I can tell it is supposed to be a continuous cum shot as Anarius suggested. =p