MT group and healer parses - Page 6

Pinski · 07-10-2007, 03:32 PM

I hate how people post a parse without giving actual duration of the parse. No really, if you want to post a parse, give a duration of the parse, not duration of the combat for the parse. Because anybody can post a parse like that if they take 3 hours to do that 1 hour of combat. This is why in parsing there is a fine line between giving accurate and inaccurate information.

Slamdar · 07-10-2007, 03:35 PM

That still really isnt a parse.... No duration (time spent out of combat between each encounter), no classes doing what dps, etc... Only reason I even said anything was because like Mateo said, people will say "I do XXX dps normally" when in actuality, the parse says something different.... 41k raidwide dps is not something hard to do with people not afk'ing and such, so grats?

Lizerd Keng · 07-10-2007, 04:23 PM

How many guilds do you think are breaking 40k? Divided by the total number of guilds, I'd say less than 10%. Maybe even less than 5%. Surely not an easy thing to do. So, thanks for the grats, and grats to you too.

Malachani · 07-10-2007, 04:34 PM

Its not surprising they didn't include player names OR classes, with the way that people on this board have a habit of totally shredding posted parses for no reason other than they enjoy tearing other people down. Even if it was just classes listed, there are some people so hellbent on making everyone else feel like shit that they would have looked at the roster and matched people up just to tell them they suck. Seriously, some people need to get a life.

More than one person asked for a ZW parse of 3rd floor, which was posted. Lena merely added a second to show that they do break 41k, as stated.

Widem · 07-10-2007, 04:43 PM

[quote=Alania;181146]More than one person asked for a ZW parse of 3rd floor[/ quote]

you are correct, there were 2. there was also some dude name mateo.

Tayger · 07-10-2007, 04:49 PM

Not sure why yall bitch about getting the whole time between encounters =p I remember it clearly that we had another mob pulled at max 10 to 15 seconds after the last one died. So yeah....

Lizerd Keng · 07-10-2007, 04:59 PM

There are many many variables in the parse that can make it look different. You have DPS and ext DPS and people that may even be out of range from the person parsing. The list goes on and on. Including the entire time you are in the zone, even when not fighting, I guess is another variable that could be included. But does it really matter? I mean it's not sitting side by side comparing it with another parse, where having all the variables exactly the same would be important. It was posted and with details on how it was done. I'd understand your arguement if just some numbers were thrown up with no details, but he did explain how the numbers were gathered. Is this method that you talk about some kind of standard that everyone uses, cause I've never heard of it. I'm not trying to be a dick. I understand the reasoning behind why this may be important. I guess we could make our zone wide higher, by waiting in between every single pull for everyone's CA's and spells to refresh. I assure you, we don't do that. We pull as soon as we regained a little power, if not sooner. If you don't wanna believe that, than I don't think typing numbers here with the parse that says official start time and end time will make you believe it either. First you wanna see a parse cause you don't believe it, then you make excuses as to why it isn't right. I gaurantee that if the parse would have had all the names and start/finish times, you would have found something else wrong.

Also, that third floor parse probably did include a few random people taking brief afk's. I know I took a couple myself and we typically have a couple people at a time taking afk's rather than the entire raid at one time.

Mateo · 07-12-2007, 03:15 PM

I never said i dint believe it or that kind of parse is impossible. Im juts sick of everyone always saying shit with no proof so ty for posting the parse about time someone fukin does. Anyways i thought i read somehwere you were doing 43k+ zonewide or something i only see 37k on that parse :P

oddyophile · 07-12-2007, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mateo

I never said i dint believe it or that kind of parse is impossible. Im juts sick of everyone always saying shit with no proof so ty for posting the parse about time someone fukin does. Anyways i thought i read somehwere you were doing 43k+ zonewide or something i only see 37k on that parse :P

There's no mention in this thread of doing 43k+ zonewide. I checked. Grevious, Alania and Lizerd mention fight parses over 41k, and as high as 48k.

razieh · 07-12-2007, 03:30 PM

Grevious said "we were parsing 41k+ all night" which would at least in my opinion mean a 41k zonewide, that is probably where he got that from.