Cochy 80 Assasin Diso-Nektulos - Page 129

Krontak · 12-12-2007, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hcre

The reason I don’t expect you to see it is because your style is to continue to demand something is the way you say it is, even if it is clearly not, until everyone realizes they are wasting time on a moron and quit responding, at which time you declare yourself the winner while everyone else has declared you the wiener.

Even thought this is a bit of a run on sentence its a great piece of writing that made me lol irl.

Laodaron · 12-12-2007, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hcre

I know I shouldn’t reply to you, because it will only encourage your ad nauseam tactic, but you make it way to tempting. Somehow I don’t think you are going to like what I have to say.
Well, since you are using the "call the other person something before they can call me that" tactic, I'll refrain from telling you that you are doing EXACTLY what you accuse me of. We'll let that one slide.

For someone who loves to flaunt their ill-conceived intelligence and jab at others for reading comprehension, you sure are one dumb illiterate person. Nowhere in that statement did I state you personally use bigoted words. The statement correctly notes that you want LFG to ALLOW you to use them. You do know what allow means, don’t you?
Using your statement in context, the derived meaning would be that I had WANTED to use them, LFG banned them, and I called him a bigot. That is indeed incorrect. I've not once wanted to use them on these boards.

My statement was in fact dead on, but I don’t expect you to see it. The reason I don’t expect you to see it is because your style is to continue to demand something is the way you say it is, even if it is clearly not, until everyone realizes they are wasting time on a moron and quit responding, at which time you declare yourself the winner while everyone else has declared you the wiener.
No, my "style" is to continue to request that you just please learn how to read. The subliminal "weiner" shot is incredibly mature. I truly must be dealing with a top notch debater.

It’s not the quantity it’s the quality, and your posts have a seriously annoying quality about them.
Wrong. You're statement was directed at amount, not quality. You may disagree with me but neither my quality nor my quantity was out of line.

The special attention you get is far from showing you are right on anything, it is more like the special attention a Down Syndrome person gets when they walk through a crowded public space. Some people are curious because they don’t see it often, some people are looking because they feel sorrow for the persons handicap, and some are looking because they enjoy seeing someone who is obviously not as capable as them. That is exactly the kind of special attention you are getting.
I appreciate the retard reference. For everyone else, please notice how this person is using retard in a hateful way. This is exactly what I was talking about earlier. Thank you for emphasizing my points.

Sure you didn’t!
I really didn't. I skimmed to my name. I went back later and re-read them, but at the time I hadn't read them. To be sure we're on the same page here, you've come along and "summarized" a thread with about half of your "summaries" incorrect and conjecture. You really aren;t the literary genius you envision yourself to be.
Statements like this only serve to show that you really suck at the art of argument/debate. You regularly employ the most novice logical fallacies, you believe that stateing something enough times that people give up trying to convince you otherwise makes you right, you use strawmen regularly, and are not afraid to employ ad hominem if it suits. Basically far from being the intellectual you think you are, and try to convince us you are, you show yourself as having an IQ slightly above trainably retarded.
Something something, I think I know big words, I think my spelling teacher just went over them today, something something. That doesn't even make sense.

No one stops reading a post because the other person supposedly misunderstands them. You quoted a line that was two sentences from the end, and when you stated at the beginning of your post “Wow, I got 4 mentions in that one post.” you make it absolutely clear you are lying because two of those mentions comes after you supposedly stopped reading.
Nope, read again sonny. I skimmed for my name, because the asshats of this site can barely refrain from quoting me, or mentioning me. Its a curse, but I deal with you asshats regularly. You're nothing special.

So what do we have here? It is a novice tactic to say “yah well I didn’t read it all cause you were wrong on the parts I read” when really you have no clue how to respond. The funny thing here is there was nothing left you needed to respond to, so you obviously just use this tactic so often it was a kneejerk reaction. You are pathetic!
Jesus, were you mad cause I didn't initially read your whole post? I didn't mean to offend you. I just didn't really care except what was mentioning me.

Morons like you regularly produce heavily ironic responses like this. Indeed it is you who can’t read. Your restate only serves to validate my initial observation. ” Laodoran is calling LFG a bigot because LFG won’t allow Laodoran to use bigoted words here, hmmmmm. And he thinks he is an intellectual!” incase you forgot!
What's funny, LFG has never punished me for not using those words. Your statement is in fact wrong.

Actually, the “n” word carries a lot of extra baggage in its history that the others do not. But I don’t expect you to have actually cracked any history books, judging by your lackluster reading comprehension skills.
Again, only because people want it to. They want to be victims. Otherwise, this word would be like every other negative word. Its just a word. But on to better subjects.

Wow you love to contradict yourself, first it was that you wouldn’t use them, yet here you are clearly stating that you do use them. Why don’t you figure out your position and then get back to us, mkay?
BAM! I said on these forums. I have no desire to use them here. If you actually HAD read my posts, you'd know that I said I'd never use them here, because of the people that want to be offended. I wouldn't give them the opportunity. However, I do use them IRL, cause they're funny words....and used to designate sarcasm. Oh, that's another literary device I don't expect you know much about.

Because of its history, any time a Caucasian uses the “n” word, it is hateful.
Shut the fuck up you racist. That's some racist shit there. I can guarantee you that there are PLENTY of Caucasians who have a right to say whatever the fuck they want. There is only the history that people want to maintain in their ridiculous racial "black history" tirades. The word contains as much hate as any of the rest of them, and limiting vernacular of a particular ethnicity or race is hilariously fascist and delicious. Wow you're an idiot and a hypocrite.
However, it is funny you are railing against those who play the victim card in a post where you have used it yourself.
I'm no victim. Nor have I claimed it. You're just grasping at straws, because you feel an irresistible urge to quote me and mention me in posts and respond to me, so you just make things up. Its a fixation issue, you might want to consider getting some help for it. Its not healthy.

Personal anecdotes mean nothing. For all we know you were the one who said that, your friends all abandoned you and you learned a lesson from it but decided to switch some roles to make you look like the good guy.
Yeah, call me a racist. I don't mind. I know I'm not, nor will I ever be.
Personal anecdotes never are useful but often used by nitwits and novices because the audience can not prove they didn’t happen. However it isn’t necessary for the audience to disprove it since the poster states it happened the onus falls on him to prove it did happen, which he can not do. Therefore it must be considered fabricated.
Read above.
Now, before you respond, I am going to throw you a bone. If you respond by simply repeating your inaccurate statements, I am only going to respond to them by pointing out what you are doing and how you are a moron still insistent on ad nauseam tactics. In other words, provide something fresh or don’t respond at all, otherwise I will further reveal you as the moron you are.

Here's my favorite part. The part where you justify your post, and attempt to discredit mine before I make it. Here's the deal. Everything you posted was bullshit. It wasn't true or honest. It was the ramblings of someone who wasn't very cool IRL, and now must take revenge on people on teh forums. Good luck with it.

I love that you use "ad nauseam." There are a few degrees that its used, but your context implies that I post non-stop. I know what the literal translation is as well, so Mr. I must be smarter cause I love Laodaron, so don't throw that shit at me either. You've lost this. You've made things up in accusations, and then when I would respond stated you wouldn't respond unless I brought something "fresh."

Well, I could bring you a Summer's Eve so your vagina would be fresh, or I could get you an enema so your brother or father or uncle (whoever it may be) will notice how fresh your ass is. Its up to you. This thread will die soon, so do what you must.

Kosh · 12-12-2007, 12:03 PM

"Here's my favorite part. The part where you justify your post, and attempt to discredit mine before I make it. Here's the deal. Everything you posted was bullshit. It wasn't true or honest. It was the ramblings of someone who wasn't very cool IRL, and now must take revenge on people on teh forums. Good luck with it. "

Epic fail. Ur sad.

Laodaron · 12-12-2007, 12:16 PM

Ok, while that wasn't a necessarily optimal line, I don't believe that it deserved an epic fail.

Otis · 12-12-2007, 01:21 PM

Lao, you can count on me to tell it like it is.

You're in over your head.

You'd be better off waiting for Ix's retard notice to reach maturity, forever banishing this thread into obscurity.

Otis · 12-12-2007, 01:24 PM

Oh yeah, and for the record, Hcre, please never say "Ad Hominem" again, mmmkay?

Kinda a sore subject around here - lol

hcre · 12-12-2007, 01:26 PM

You replied and did just what I said you would do. Outstanding!

You open by revealing that you don’t know what ad nauseam means. Here’s a hint, length of the post has nothing to do with it though really poor users of ad nauseam will often have longer posts.

Then you follow that up by restating your strawman argument that I was saying you want to use the words, even though my original statement makes it clear you want to be allowed to use the words. The truly funny thing is this makes no difference; you are calling LFG a bigot because he won’t allow you to use bigoted words. No matter how you try to avoid it, that is what you have said many times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

No, my "style" is to continue to request that you just please learn how to read. The subliminal "weiner" shot is incredibly mature. I truly must be dealing with a top notch debater.

You’re exactly right, that is your “style” as that is ad nauseam!

There was nothing subliminal about my wiener shot, do you know what subliminal means? It was a play on winner, and everyone but you got it. This is funny since you claim to be the master reader amongst us.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

Wrong. You're statement was directed at amount, not quality. You may disagree with me but neither my quality nor my quantity was out of line.

My statement was directed at both amount and quantity, though it was not necessarily the amount of posts you made or the amount of crap in your posts. When you figure out what ad nauseam means, maybe you will understand. Maybe.

And declaring your own crap doesn’t stink has little bearing on the rest of us who smell it for what it is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

I really didn't. I skimmed to my name. I went back later and re-read them, but at the time I hadn't read them. To be sure we're on the same page here, you've come along and "summarized" a thread with about half of your "summaries" incorrect and conjecture. You really aren;t the literary genius you envision yourself to be.

Take a moment to notice two things.

First, everyone else, and I mean everyone who has posted so far about it but you, loved my post. Even others who were jabbed at loved it. Why should I take your word over the word of all those other posters? Do you ever stop and wonder if you might be wrong about something when everyone else is saying the opposite? Actually it is ok, I realize your ego is fragile and can’t allow for my jabs to be accurate or else you will fall apart. This leads us to the next point.

Second, I have not once touted my literary skills, and certainly have never declared myself a literary genius. People who resort to declaring themselves genius or intellectually superior at anything, are almost always complete morons. You fit that bill to the t.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

Quote:

Originally Posted by hcre

Morons like you regularly produce heavily ironic responses like this. Indeed it is you who can’t read. Your restate only serves to validate my initial observation. ” Laodoran is calling LFG a bigot because LFG won’t allow Laodoran to use bigoted words here, hmmmmm. And he thinks he is an intellectual!” incase you forgot!

What's funny, LFG has never punished me for not using those words. Your statement is in fact wrong.

I never said LFG did punish you for using them. When you are done shooting holes in that strawman you have constructed feel free discuss what I actually said. But again, it isn’t your style to stop using strawmen until everyone else gives up, at which point you declare yourself the winner. Though admittedly you do also have a problem with premature ejaculation when it comes to declaring yourself the winner, so we will no doubt see it a few times before that point as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

Quote:

Originally Posted by hcre

Actually, the “n” word carries a lot of extra baggage in its history that the others do not. But I don’t expect you to have actually cracked any history books, judging by your lackluster reading comprehension skills.

Again, only because people want it to. They want to be victims. Otherwise, this word would be like every other negative word. Its just a word. But on to better subjects.

Why am I not surprised to see you priding yourself in your ignorance.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

Quote:

Originally Posted by hcre

Because of its history, any time a Caucasian uses the “n” word, it is hateful.

Shut the fuck up you racist. That's some racist shit there. I can guarantee you that there are PLENTY of Caucasians who have a right to say whatever the fuck they want. There is only the history that people want to maintain in their ridiculous racial "black history" tirades. The word contains as much hate as any of the rest of them, and limiting vernacular of a particular ethnicity or race is hilariously fascist and delicious. Wow you're an idiot and a hypocrite.

Is that really the best you could do? That argument sounds like it came from a KKK pamphlet somewhere.

I thought about clueing you in to what the “n” word really means, but I think you need to have your ass pummeled a few times for using it, so I refrained.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

Here's my favorite part. The part where you justify your post, and attempt to discredit mine before I make it. Here's the deal. Everything you posted was bullshit. It wasn't true or honest. It was the ramblings of someone who wasn't very cool IRL, and now must take revenge on people on teh forums. Good luck with it.

For someone who declares themselves intellectually superior, that was one lousy half baked attempt at a comeback. I don’t have to tell you to try again, I already know you will.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

I love that you use "ad nauseam." There are a few degrees that its used, but your context implies that I post non-stop. I know what the literal translation is as well, so Mr. I must be smarter cause I love Laodaron, so don't throw that shit at me either. You've lost this. You've made things up in accusations, and then when I would respond stated you wouldn't respond unless I brought something "fresh."

Posting non-stop is actually not a meaning of ad nauseam. Repeating the same thing over and over while ignoring counters until people just quit responding at which point you declare you won is ad nauseam. For example, you have tried to tell me incorrectly what I said at least six times in two posts regarding allowing you to use bigoted words. You will no doubt continue to tell me incorrectly what I have said for as long as I am willing to respond. You also somehow misunderstood from the end of my last post that I would not be responding in this post, and so have declared me the loser, indirectly declaring yourself the winner. Thus it is clear ad nauseam is your style, and already declaring yourself the winner proves that you have a problem with premature ejaculation.

I did not state that I would not respond if you did not bring something “fresh,” though I have no doubt you will continue to tell me I did, I did in fact say that if you did not I would responding by pointing out that you are a moron who continues to employ ad nauseam and point it out for everyone to laugh at you. I apparently know myself fairly well, as that is exactly what I have done.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laodaron

Well, I could bring you a Summer's Eve so your vagina would be fresh, or I could get you an enema so your brother or father or uncle (whoever it may be) will notice how fresh your ass is. Its up to you. This thread will die soon, so do what you must.

Statements like this serve to show the true extent of your intelligence. I may have given you too much benefit of the doubt when I stated your IQ was just above trainably retarded.

Would you care to be abused some more?

Broomhilde · 12-12-2007, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otis

Lao, you can count on me to tell it like it is.

You're in over your head.

Its gone alot farther than that, this shit is becoming painful to watch! It's like watching Ms. South Carolina regurgitate on "The iraq" while having a debate against Albert Einstein, Gil Noble and Willliam F. Buckley simutaneously. LFG needs to lock this already and spare us the misery of watching anymore.

They shoot horses don't they?

Brilliant posts Hcre.

hcre · 12-12-2007, 02:00 PM

Lol, I do realize that this isn’t exactly fair. And I don’t pride myself in it nor do I enjoy doing it. This is about as much sport as shooting an unconscious deer point blank.

Honestly I was hoping that handing his ass to him on a silver platter while meticulously explaining why and how I was handing his ass to him, might just make him pause the next time he decides to make the ad nauseam posts he is famous for.

I also realize it will likely not work. But I had to try.

Otis · 12-12-2007, 02:10 PM

You know what you are? You're like a big bear with claws and with fangs..

...big fucking teeth, man.

Yeah... big fuckin' teeth on ya'. And Lao's just like this little bunny, who's just kinda cowering in the corner.

Shivering.

Yeah, man just kinda... you know, you got these claws and you're staring at these claws and your thinking to yourself, and with these claws you're thinking, "How am I supposed to kill this bunny, how am I supposed to kill this bunny?"

And you're poking at it, you're poking at it...

Yeah, you're not hurting it. You're just kinda gently batting the bunny around, you know what I mean? And the bunny's scared, the bunny's scared of you, shivering.

And you got these fucking claws and these fangs...

And you got these fucking claws and these fangs, man! And you're looking at your claws and you're looking at your fangs. And you're thinking to yourself, you don't know what to do, man. "I don't know how to kill the bunny." With *this* you don't know how to kill the bunny, do you know what I mean?

You're like a big bear, man.