 |
|
03-21-2008, 02:13 PM
|
|
|
I have lost touch with reality!~
Character: Foggy/Peztilence
Guild: Exceeds
Server: Kithicor
Posts: 422
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twister
I don't know why people are bitching that you did something wrong or unethical LFG, if they would take the time and actually read the site rules .................
6. The Administrators are entitled to repost or otherwise disclose any PM, email, or other communication sent to them by anyone.
Which has been posted on this thread already, but people are still bitching about it.
|
Twister the PM was not sent to LFG!
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:14 PM
|
|
|
Regular
Character: Zaquelle
Guild: Siege
Server: Najena
Posts: 248
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
More dev PM posts! There has got to be more juicy stuff in there...
__________________
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:14 PM
|
|
|
Nakir In'herear
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
O well was fun for awhile.....
Quote:
You have been banned.
Your ability to post is being put on hold for three days as you are spamming your agenda item across the boards and not attempting to insert it into the proper conversation. When the suspension lifts, please discuss things like this in the appropriate forum instead of in every forum. Thank you. Grimwell
|
I would have to give prop's to Grimwell as thats the 1st time I was banned, for a justified reason, and was explained the reason.
Last edited by Gtwo; 03-21-2008 at 02:16 PM.
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:15 PM
|
|
|
Regular
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
Hmmm. This whole situation wreaks of The Voodoo.
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:15 PM
|
|
|
King of the Ellipsis...
Character: Lounge (retired)
Server: Mistmoore
Posts: 1,937
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
Good to see they sometimes ban people for decent reasons, with decent explanations  Would have been hilarious to see the typical cookie cutter ban message 
__________________

"Voy a navegar, al puerto del alma, cruzando el mar, hasta que llegaré"
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:16 PM
|
|
|
Newcastle United
Character: RL
Guild: ESPM United FC
Server: The Gym
Posts: 304
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
Nice how they just cram the whole thing together into the NGD discussion.. didn't even get a "we'll look into this" or anything.
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:18 PM
|
|
|
Eats Babies
Character: Stivan
Guild: Strike
Server: Lucan D'Lere
Posts: 982
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
The link to the "merged" shame on you gets an error... how convienent..
http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/p...opic_id=409272
__________________
"The optomist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds; the pessimist fears this is true."
-James Branch Cabell
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:18 PM
|
|
|
The Morning Sausage
Character: Uhh
Guild: Umm
Server: Nothing
Posts: 1,176
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
Raistin if you don't get banned, then you've given it your very best attempt! lol
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:18 PM
|
|
|
Visitor
Character: Agnar
Server: retired-for now
Posts: 38
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
Swan song?????
I started using this site back when I played in 2006 and early 2007. Not once has my visiting this site been impacted by how much, or if, developers post here.
I read this site to stay abreast of what is happening to EQ2 in case I ever come back-and for the many personalities and threads which provide unlimited amusement.
LFG, you built this site based on an open and diverse community and it is this very community that will help keep EQ2 Flames alive and well no matter the official SOE position.
Buck up little camper--we can all look down the road and hope that SOE cleans house and gets rid of the unethical people and a group of professionals will come in and realize the potential and good this site brings to the EQ2 community.
And if that never happens-screw them for their lack of integrity-we don't need them.
The Duke, no matter how bad things looked, never threw in the towel. He kept fighting for what he believed in and I'd encourage you to do the same.
I'm here regardless of how SOE treats this site.
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 02:19 PM
|
|
|
Worldwide Bestest Numbfuck
Character: Fleaball
Guild: Retired - AOD
Server: Crushbone
Posts: 420
|
Re: Back at you, SOE
I would say that the original poster of the screenshot should ask them to give it it's own thread since the screenshot is off topic.
A Dos attack has nothing to do with a corrupted dev...
or does it??????????????????
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|