Go Back   EQ2Flames Forum > EQ2Flames Center Stage > Hall of Flames

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-21-2008, 02:42 PM  
LFG
Administrator
 
LFG's Avatar
 
Character: Retired
Guild: Onyx
Server: Nagafen

Posts: 15,844
Photos: (373)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caswydian View Post
This whole argument rests on the assumption that the strategy in question is actually considered an exploit by SOE. Prove it's an exploit, and you might have a case, but otherwise, the only one doing anything wrong here is LFG.
I'm a bad, bad man.

Rumor is I'm also responsible for global warming, world hunger, and US immigration problems.
__________________

LFG is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:42 PM  
Visitor
 
Illusen's Avatar
 
Character: Illuin
Guild: WoW
Server: Lothar

Posts: 61
Photos: (0)

Send a message via MSN to Illusen Send a message via Yahoo to Illusen
Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelus View Post
Here's the difference between LFG and SOE you dumb motherfuckers.

If LFG is unethical, it corrupts a fansite message board.

If SOE devs are unethical, it corrupt's our fucking game that many of us put much time and love into playing.

If you want to attack LFG's ethics do not use it as an excuse to diminish the impropriety of Aerilik, Zoltaroth et.al.

All of you Nandy Plus Ultra lovers, LFG haters, refuters of the Aerilik smoking gun make me sick. 99% of everyone thinks you are idiots.
Also, I don't remember paying a monthly fee to post on EQ2Flames, pretty sure I did that to play EQ2...
__________________
Illusen is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:42 PM  
Regular
 

Posts: 381
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darammer View Post
Cas, the fact that the dev says he is "willing to look the other way" shows that HE, at least, considered it an exploit.
No it doesn't. Regardless, what matters is if SOE as an organization considers it an exploit, not an individual dev. Has anyone been punished for using this strategy, or even been approached by an SOE representative as a result?
Caswydian is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:42 PM  
OMB!
 
stryph's Avatar
 
Character: Striff
Guild: Conviction
Server: Mistmoore

Posts: 719
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darammer View Post
Ahhh, the principles upon which EQ2Flames was founded!
If you pulled your head out of your ass you would realise that everything that comes out of Manrattens mouth is fucking trash.
stryph is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:43 PM  
OMB!
 
stryph's Avatar
 
Character: Striff
Guild: Conviction
Server: Mistmoore

Posts: 719
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by LFG View Post
I'm a bad, bad man.

Rumor is I'm also responsible for global warming, world hunger, and US immigration problems.
Someone has to take the blame. Personally, I think its Nibers fault.
stryph is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:44 PM  
Worldwide Bestest Numbfuck
 
vcjester's Avatar
 
Character: Fleaball
Guild: Retired - AOD
Server: Crushbone

Posts: 480
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by LFG View Post
I actually tried to register on that site, and intended to vote that I thought EQ2 was better than those other completely different games that I'd never play, but I still can't figure out how to vote after I registered.
They hadn't closed the thread yet so I assumed voting was still up.

Guess SOE lost out in the first round. I bet the lil team at THAT particular Rockstar are peeing themselves over beating a mega developer like SOE. ROTF
__________________
http://www.box.net/shared/static/495eh29ayu.jpg
vcjester is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:44 PM  
Gnorfling Dirzerksin
 
Character: Darammer
Server: Ex-Kithicor

Posts: 438
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelus View Post
Here's the difference between LFG and SOE you dumb motherfuckers.

If LFG is unethical, it corrupts a fansite message board.

If SOE devs are unethical, it corrupt's our fucking game that many of us put much time and love into playing.

If you want to attack LFG's ethics do not use it as an excuse to diminish the impropriety of Aerilik, Zoltaroth et.al.

All of you Nandy Plus Ultra lovers, LFG haters, refuters of the Aerilik smoking gun make me sick. 99% of everyone thinks you are idiots.
And somewhere else, there is a mob of people up in arms about LFG, to whom I am beating home the fact that Aerelik's breech was just as bad.

I somehow don't think Aerelik's deeds will get swept under the rug around here; on the other hand, as you say, the majority (perhaps not quite 99%) of people around here will look the other way about LFG's misdeed.
__________________
Darammer is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:44 PM  
Cuz
one immature posted
 

Posts: 412
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by stryph View Post
If you pulled your head out of your ass you would realise that everything that comes out of Manrattens mouth is fucking trash.
Granted, but if we don't allow him to post here we become just the anti-SOE version of the official forum.
__________________
Most of us promote responsible testosterone dick waggling. - Evangel

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sashtan View Post
i'm a huge fan of the cock
Cuz is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:44 PM  
LFG
Administrator
 
LFG's Avatar
 
Character: Retired
Guild: Onyx
Server: Nagafen

Posts: 15,844
Photos: (373)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

People, please do not spam the official forums with this.

Grimwell has already posted it in the NGD thread.

I'm actually pleasantly surprised by that and will give him credit for it.

So please, do not spam the official forums.

Thank you
__________________

LFG is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 02:45 PM  
Regular
 

Posts: 381
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Back at you, SOE

Quote:
Originally Posted by LFG View Post
I'm a bad, bad man.

Rumor is I'm also responsible for global warming, world hunger, and US immigration problems.
If you violated the trust implied by a private message, then yes. While it's certainly a minor offense in the big scheme of things, it does undermine your position, doubly so if it turns out there is no wrong-doing.

Further, one must question your motives here - why not communicate this information privately with SOE instead of making it public? Is the intent here to really see the problem resolved or is it to fire up your followers and try to embarrass SOE
Caswydian is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Sponsor Ads


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifications by TMS