 |
|
01-21-2008, 08:22 PM
|
|
|
Fuck Aeralik. EQ2 can do better.
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dystrax
This isnt over simplification, this is ignorance. Yes, if you have a coercer and an illusionist on a raid, the illy should probably be in the mage group and the coercer in the melee group but that doesn't make them pro/anti anything.
|
Maybe it is your ignorance. The smart people will silently figure it out, not wanting to give me too much credit. The dumb people will recite lines from EQ2 For Dummies.
|
|
|
01-21-2008, 10:30 PM
|
|
|
Dysgruntled
Character: Dystrax
Guild: Middle Aged Warriors
Server: Butcherblock
Posts: 318
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminator
Maybe it is your ignorance. The smart people will silently figure it out, not wanting to give me too much credit. The dumb people will recite lines from EQ2 For Dummies.
|
silently figure what out? do i need a decoder wheel? ouija board?
i assume you mean coercers have a DPS buff that really only benefits melee and damage shield/hate decrease that works best on melee, whereas illy has only haste and IA for melee but has a great spell proc/hate decrease that works for casters. but it is ignorant to say that this means one or the other is pro/anti caster/melee.
on top of that, remember that this is a thread where someone is asking for advice about something they don't know about. eq2 for dummies is pretty much exactly what the OP was asking for. are you honestly saying that your response in this thread is only directed at people who are "in the know" and not at the OP? and, if it was in fact directed at the OP, wouldn't the better option be to explain yourself in some way rather than leave it entirely cryptic.
|
|
|
01-21-2008, 10:35 PM
|
|
|
Visitor
Character: Twisting
Server: Crushbone
Posts: 30
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
You're right Illuminator, you should hear the melee classes bitch when I get thrown in a group with them. They hate me taking up a spot in thier group that could be held by someone who can buff them. . . oh. . . wait. . . nm.
Coercers are a niche class. Illusionists can join any group and make it better. If you want life to be simple make an Illusionist. If you want more of a challenge roll a coercer. It doesn't really matter in the end, you can always betray if you change your mind.
__________________
Last edited by Twisting; 01-21-2008 at 10:37 PM.
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 10:05 AM
|
|
|
Regular
Character: Sziroten
Server: Lagserver Valor
Posts: 426
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
illuminator.. you forgot the fun part.... coercerer got troll and rattonga illu > illusionist
but.. a good illu will always more dpsing a coercere unless the coercerer can cast his reactives every second and the target hits ae's like hell melee and magic every second...
with RoK i would say coercerer got a boost with they're dps, there are a lot encounter with a lot of ae's which boost your personal dps a lot but not nearly a really good illusionist....
illusionist got a group invis as well which quit nice in groupplay and so on.. i feel its challenging to play a coercerer not more or less, i like it and i fucking died alot cause my pet brokes hrhr but hey... i like it ^^
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 12:07 PM
|
|
|
I switched mains!
Character: Wayn Brady
Guild: Confirmed
Server: Unrest
Posts: 596
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
first of all, playing any class isnt hard, least of all a coercer. A coercer job is simple, do what an illusionist does, flow, control power, dps, only you get to slack and shit for dps will get you by just fine 95% of the time. Ive seen parses from coercers that compete, but most of them just suck so bad ( or have un-comparable groups) or both! That it they can be coupled with bards as far as slacking fucks go.
Soloing on an illusionist is easy as it gets sure, because its so much harder rooting somethign and haveing your pet drop a 15k nuke on its face every 15 seconds. Heres an idea, have them both fight at range, dont be a retard and dot it, charm breaks the one you were figthing is already rooted because your clearly not a retard, and all you have to do is mez and re-charm your pet, GG.
Everytime this conversation comes up, which annoyingly enough is often, a coercer or 6 feel the need to come in here and go on about how much more skillful they are. Guess what, we both mana flow and push buttons.
As for the OP, if your going to be casual it really doesnt matter, do what you want. If you want to raid, most guilds field 1 coercer, and 2, possibly 3 illys. Illys are simply better rounded, and can do more, better. Want to be a mana battery, or have a spot in the mt group, roll coercer, want to compete with tier 1 dps while being a mana battery and haveing groups fight over you, roll an illy.
__________________
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 12:12 PM
|
|
|
I switched mains!
Character: Wayn Brady
Guild: Confirmed
Server: Unrest
Posts: 596
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
sigh...i am a sad panda when i see these posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slips
To me chanters are:
1. CC
2. Buffs
3. DPS
First of all, you are a retard. I will take the liberty of fixing this since you dont have a clue:
1.DPS/BUFFIES!
crowd control does not exist in everquest 2, eq1 is that way --->
I played a coercer for a while, but I am an illusionist now.
Secondly, please do us all a favor, go back and never come back to these boards.
|
__________________
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
Regular
Character: Sziroten
Server: Lagserver Valor
Posts: 426
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
Without any buffs from troub etc. parsing over 2k is not that bad for a ugly coercerer isn't it?
...and btw. channel > any manabuff from illusionist
Edit: but have to agree.. there are a lot of chanters out there which suck in they're class waiting for the moment they can stun or mezz a mob for cc 
Last edited by Cenarius; 01-22-2008 at 12:20 PM.
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
Show Don't Tell
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cenarius
Without any buffs from troub etc. parsing over 2k is not that bad for a ugly coercerer isn't it?
...and btw. channel > any manabuff from illusionist
Edit: but have to agree.. there are a lot of chanters out there which suck in they're class waiting for the moment they can stun or mezz a mob for cc 
|
Channel, while it is pretty good, does not compare anywhere near to Savante.
__________________
How many times do you hear it? It goes on all day long
Everyone knows everything And no one's ever wrong
Until later...
Who can you believe? It's hard to play it safe
But apart from a few good friends We don't take anything on faith
Until later..
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 12:51 PM
|
|
|
Regular
Character: Sziroten
Server: Lagserver Valor
Posts: 426
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinski
Channel, while it is pretty good, does not compare anywhere near to Savante.
|
hm wait... didn't had a nearly mana intensive fight since rok, normal managroupreg + 10min long groupregg + manaward was enough for the hole fight but can an illy give anyone nearly 0%- nearly 100% mana in a second?
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
Show Don't Tell
|
Re: Illus v. Coercer - Further Explaination
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cenarius
hm wait... didn't had a nearly mana intensive fight since rok, normal managroupreg + 10min long groupregg + manaward was enough for the hole fight but can an illy give anyone nearly 0%- nearly 100% mana in a second?
|
Does anybody go to 0% power anymore?
__________________
How many times do you hear it? It goes on all day long
Everyone knows everything And no one's ever wrong
Until later...
Who can you believe? It's hard to play it safe
But apart from a few good friends We don't take anything on faith
Until later..
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|