Max Crushing? - Page 2

Slips · 12-04-2008, 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amadeus

Ah yes, 'vs' crushing, not 'crushing'. I've been a mage my whole life (EQ+EQ2) so never really looked at melee/mitigation stats very much; therefore I read it too quickly and missed those two letters (that, and it was 3:00 a.m. when I did it.)

So yea, pointless adornment. I have billions of transmutables and crafted it myself so it's not any loss ..lol.

I didn't notice your name until now Amadeus, /wave.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinski

They aren't pointless. If you're raiding in TSO tbh they are probably the choice for wrist adornments since there's no other easy way to get more mitigation as a mage.

Frenzied slice for example is what..slashing damage? 154 mitigation would reduce a 10k AE by how much, given a mage's raid mit would be around 2000-2200 with the adorns?

Lithin · 12-04-2008, 03:57 AM

well then let us not adorn our items at all... what is 16 str gonna do ? what is 100 health gonna do?

its everything adding up...

Amadeus · 12-04-2008, 05:11 AM

I never forgave SOE for going back on their word that "there will never be pvp in EQ2" ....bastards. SO much wasted man-hours and resources coding and maintaining those gay pvp servers.

With regard to the adornments, I enjoy the STR adornments -- let's me carry an extra strong box or two.

Pinski · 12-04-2008, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slips

I didn't notice your name until now Amadeus, /wave.

Frenzied slice for example is what..slashing damage? 154 mitigation would reduce a 10k AE by how much, given a mage's raid mit would be around 2000-2200 with the adorns?

Yah but what would 32 sta or 32 int do instead? 32 int isn't doing shit. 32 sta adds a bit of HP, but considering the most likely to do from AEs are physical based, the mit is going to help the most, since the other AEs are just the likelyhood of curing them before they tic and you die.

Slips · 12-04-2008, 08:58 AM

Right, I agree with the notion, I just wasn't sure what the curve was on mit. Right now 100 mit looks like ~2% absorption so I'm sure it will be linear with that for all that matters to us.