 |
|
06-13-2007, 02:18 PM
|
|
|
i r slack
Character: Flaeme
Server: Splitpaw
Posts: 293
|
Re: GU 36
I mean if we also add in the new bard line with even more DA.. omg..
All mages should go melee style! Go with the flow baby..
On a more serious note though; If the point of this change was to make the sucky lines more interesting, SoE, you failed MISERABLY!
|
|
|
06-13-2007, 03:14 PM
|
|
|
Rift Inc
Character: Nubi
Guild: Onyx
Server: Nagafen
Posts: 400
|
Re: GU 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinski
It didn't say removing, it added it. Fuck, bastards are going to ruin my DPS then. Then again, why the fuck are they even adding that requirement? Considering how fucking weak our melee hits as it is, there is absolutely no point in going STR line anyway. So fuck, remove this dumb change before it goes live, and in fact makes the line even worse than it already is.
|
Yeah I already feedbacked this shit on test server. If they're going to make changes at least let them make halfway fucking decent ones.
__________________
Nubi - Warlock of Onyx (Nagafen PVP)
|
|
|
06-13-2007, 04:32 PM
|
|
|
Now what?
|
Re: GU 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by WAPCE
Any chance the non-removal of secondary requirement in Perpetuality was an oversight? The loss of haste didn't seem as bad when I thought I was getting another symbol.
|
To answer my own question, I asked Locke(ye) whether this was intentional, and he replied, "The fix for this one is scheduled for later this week." So I think that's good news.
|
|
|
06-13-2007, 04:32 PM
|
|
|
Show Don't Tell
|
Re: GU 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by WAPCE
To answer my own question, I asked Locke(ye) whether this was intentional, and he replied, "The fix for this one is scheduled for later this week." So I think that's good news.
|
Ugh.
__________________
How many times do you hear it? It goes on all day long
Everyone knows everything And no one's ever wrong
Until later...
Who can you believe? It's hard to play it safe
But apart from a few good friends We don't take anything on faith
Until later..
|
|
|
06-14-2007, 08:18 AM
|
|
|
Look Ma, I caught a Fraggle
Character: Alinabal
Guild: Retired
Server: Runnyeye
Posts: 454
|
Re: GU 36
when you talk to him next Wapce, tell him the brigands are going to find him and cut his balls off
|
|
|
06-14-2007, 09:50 AM
|
|
|
Now what?
|
Re: GU 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alinabal
when you talk to him next Wapce, tell him the brigands are going to find him and cut his balls off
|
I only sent him a PM. Feel free to do the same, though I imagine it won't be well-received. 
|
|
|
06-15-2007, 10:46 AM
|
|
|
Something witty!
Character: Back around
Guild: None Yet
Server: Unrest
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: GU 36
See I send him PM's and he flames me, wtf!
|
|
|
06-15-2007, 11:01 AM
|
|
|
Show Don't Tell
|
Re: GU 36
Well they removed secondary requirement from Perpetuality, and didn't change it.
__________________
How many times do you hear it? It goes on all day long
Everyone knows everything And no one's ever wrong
Until later...
Who can you believe? It's hard to play it safe
But apart from a few good friends We don't take anything on faith
Until later..
|
|
|
06-15-2007, 12:29 PM
|
|
|
Now what?
|
Re: GU 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinski
AGI, 4-4-7-8-Perpetuality
INT, 6-4-4-8-Volatile Magic
Reasoning is that well, now we will have 12% Casting Haste from Chronosiphoning, 42% Recovery Haste from Chronomotion, and 14.4% Casting Haste from Chronology, and the last 60% from Perpetuality, a total of 86.4(94.4 with a bard that maxes Allegro). Whereas our old AGI, 4-8-8-3-Perpetuality spec would give us 15% Casting Haste from Chronosiphoning, 48% Recovery Haste from Chronomotion, 5.4% Casting Haste from Chronology, and the last 60% from Perpetuality, a total of 80.4(88.4 with bard that maxes Allegro).
|
What does the resist value on Chronosiphoning look like on test? I thought that it went up with each point on live, but the screenshots of test I've seen show ranks 1 and 2 at 25%.
|
|
|
06-15-2007, 12:37 PM
|
|
|
Taste'Therainbow
Character: Razlin
Server: Permafrost
Posts: 98
|
Re: GU 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinski
Well they removed secondary requirement from Perpetuality, and didn't change it.
|
so we are indeed now going to be able to fill our secondary slot?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|