Judgement Set bonuses - Worth the Gems? - Page 2

Leorra · 01-30-2008, 03:10 AM

Hmmm arnt the VP sets getting revamped along with the zone?

Stoic · 01-30-2008, 07:02 AM

There is absolutely no facts to support a rumor that ANYTHING is getting upgraded. Its all a bunch of speculation and conjecture that VP loot will be increased in desireablity. Don't get your hopes up about anything being upgraded.

There is however a good probability that set armor might get a revamp at some point and that VP loot will get upgraded due to public outcry. That however is purely speculation due to how much they suck balls.

Leorra · 01-30-2008, 07:28 AM

Yeah Im getting them all jic of revamp just need gloves and bp now.

arturos · 01-30-2008, 03:06 PM

I wonder what it would take to give us a chance to choose addons when we craft our set armor. Take the master crafted stuff for instance, dependant on the type of armor you can get different stats. But i dont wanna mess with the stats really, but the effects that are assigned to the armor.. wtf am i gonna do with health regen? or Melee crit?? seriously?

Or the opposite could be true perhaps i need a shit ton of crit cause i have some other build in mind?? like spell crit?

All im saying is this. leave the stats alone (i guess) and the set bonuses (gag) but give us some choices in the individual bumps on each piece.
Like a menu to chose from of generic healer based choices.. like heal crit +, spell crit + meelee crit plus, power regen, health regen(dunno why but some idiot will want it)

You could if you wanted to make an entire inq set with all +s to heal crit... or hell all plusses to spell crit... Once crafted thats it.. no mas u made ur choice if u wanna do something else u gotta get another patteren and gems and destroy the piece u got...

Would that be to hard?? Its obvious that they cant do itemization worth a shit, why not give us some control over the end product that would be tailored to our individual play styles so we will be forced to STFU.

Joshisgreat · 02-01-2008, 05:44 AM

yeah, our fabled set up is pretty fucking shitty, made by pretty fucking stupid people, for a class that those stupid people dont give 2 shits about, for proof, see E:Fanatacism.

Catseyes · 02-05-2008, 12:49 PM

I m sure the inquisitor raiding population is divided among their role and the set bonus they want to fill the purpose. Somes will say that they re healers before meleers, some will that we re meleers before healers.
Fact is our class have been so mixed up that we havent a definite and clear role. As jack-o'alltrades ,we can be kinda MT healers, kinda OT healers, kinda dps buffers.

as this state,i can see a dev who never played inquie (coz i m sure none of them played one, when i see how our class changed since day one ) scratching his head to content every side of our job and finally copy/pasting templar one with spell adaptation.

I m not defending them , but well... what is really our role ? arent we clerics first in all ? The CAs and battlecleric bough more troubles in what purpose we re dedicaced to .

Alexendria · 02-05-2008, 01:03 PM

The biggest problem that I see with Inq's is that the Dev's themselves have no vission for our class. We are stuck in a middle ground between healer/debuffer and DPSer/debuffer. Because of that we are not great at either.

Personally I play my Inq as a healer/debuffer. I'm not in a hardcore raiding guild so I don't feel comfortable enough with new mobs (We are currently in T2) to go full DPS spec since we are just learning them and my healing helps win fights, yet our heal specs makes us a upper/middle healer at best. We do debuff very well though and our Mit debuff is undervalued by a lot of Inq's IMO. If you don't have that debuff on the mob the whole fight you're just wrong.

I just wish that the Devs would make up their minds and just go with it. Personally I think that we should be healers/debuffers. I would like to see more debuffs with greater effectivness and perhaps longer durations. If my Str and ability debuffs lasted longer I would not have to refresh them as often and run fanat for longer increasing my groups DPS during trash and could focus more on healing or DPSing as your taste may be during named.

Just some rambelings I guess.

narbuvold · 02-05-2008, 01:54 PM

Well, it seems like soe want to make us more of a dps group healer (with Dogma and inquisition helping us) and since our buffs mainly aims for melee dps that normaly doesn't get hit as hard as the mages does, the healing never gets to heavy.
So in a scout group we can also debuff and dps(and while dpsing, giving the group an extra buff)
I see this as our main purpuse since most of our spells seems aimed towards this..
Fury is the best healer for a mage group, inq the best for a melee group.

Catseyes · 02-06-2008, 07:02 AM

when you talk about melee it depends. Our reactives arent best for the real dps melees that are scouts. Reactives are weak against spike dmg , and scouts are taking that both from AEs and random attacks.
Best healers for scouts are either druids or shamans.

I say best, as we can heal great also ,but our heals arent just perfect for avoidance / low mitig melees.