our new x2 set

the_mo · 03-03-2009, 10:46 AM

borowing calberaks images for comparison:

NOTE! the raid set pics are the current live ones, changes on test will be discussed seperately.

================================================== =========

no pic of the new forearms for they drop directly as items in the new zone because SOMEONE fucked up the legendary sets and forgot to add forearms and later stating this wouldve been intended

also: sony left a special hint for us:

the_mo · 03-03-2009, 11:18 AM

also for those interested, the appearance. so obviously they hired some WOW designer because all the new armors ive seen lately (the robe within this lon museum and shit) looks soooo incredibly wow and not beloning to eq2, its amazing... and sad.

ok here we go:

and strange melee-set wearable for us:

Calain · 03-03-2009, 11:24 AM

I think it would be fair to compare the new x4 set with the new x2 set, as many blue texts got upgraded on the x4 set.

Still a very low STR value on the Inquisitor set btw. I'll try to get onto the TestCopy server today and write some /feedback about the new set as well as the set changes. (e.g. why do we have +spell / heal without +CA on the new x2 set?)

the_mo · 03-03-2009, 11:27 AM

well, my thinking was this: its obviously an improvement to the t2 shard set and people have been afraid, that itll be better than current raid loot, hence i compared it to the current TSO raid set

Phrozen · 03-03-2009, 11:34 AM

Ok for appearance slot I guess...

Shurikan · 03-03-2009, 11:58 AM

At least its an upgrade to the tso raid pieces appearance-wise. Any chance on showing what the "Strange" melee set has on it ?

the_mo · 03-03-2009, 12:00 PM

yea ill post screens in a coupls of minutes. its got no healing stats whatsoever, only damage-stuff and a couple of procs (4set is heal on spellcast, 5set is heal on melee hit)...

Licentiosus · 03-03-2009, 12:06 PM

low hp, low crit miti & crazy visual =\ trash

the_mo · 03-03-2009, 12:09 PM

required full holy warrior set as basis.

Shurikan · 03-03-2009, 01:11 PM

appreciate the links !