Calain

If INT would not be our critical mitigation stat that would be nice. So we would loose some critical mitigation, which isn't so nice on many fights.

Also please log on Test and /feedback, that our new 5 set bonus is crap and go to the official forums and do the same there. Maybe I should start an own thread about it and link it here so that we can better consolidate our wishes.

Edwin Ahe

It gives maximum 10% (at 1200 int) and that can be easily ignored on most fights.

And I do not exactly understand why you are so upset about 5set bonus. It's a nice single-target proc that will add nice numbers to our heals. And because it's a single-target it will still proc multiple times on group-spells. (it can be better ofc, for example REH-type proc would be much better, but its still nice thing)

__________________

"LFG" as "Community Relations Representative" in `08!

pagansaint

Its something I'd expect to find on a piece on legendary from a mid tier heroic.

It would be nice if there was a large amount of continuous reactive triggering damage in a majority of encounters, but as is its just large bursts, chokers, and a bare minimum of damage shields.

__________________

Edwin Ahe

Anyway..... Look at swashbucklers they asked for a change to their mythical and see what they got

__________________

"LFG" as "Community Relations Representative" in `08!

Calain

That was 'cause of 5 or 6 retards that started a thread mentioning how bad an open AE proc would be and that they do not get any temp bonus without offering balanced alternatives.

BTW: I now created a new thread in the In Testing Forum:
Feedback concerning the 5 set bonus of the T4 Inquisitor set

TheOtherDude

Not like we have much to lose here, though. Are you honestly expecting the proc to account for more than 1% of your healing? I'm thinkin' it'll parse out to about a 1/2 percent boost...could be wrong though /shrug.

EDIT: Anyone know how the proc on the avatar Cleric BP parses? It's WAY the hell better than the 5-set proc, and I thought I heard it was only parsing to like 1.5%.

Avirodar

The cleric avatar BP parses like shit. It is good for the critical mitigation, +base healing, and +heal crit chance. If the proc reactive vanished one day, it may take me a while to notice.

pagansaint

And its a rather damn large reactive trigger.

__________________

Ryuujin

I don't see why Inquisitors would have to sacrifice healing potential just to get STR added to their set. Furies barely sacrifice any healing potential relative to our set, while getting 267 INT, 12 Spell Crit, 230 Spell Amount, 8 Base Spell Damage, and 1 Spell Crit Bonus.

The only major edges Inquisitors get healing-wise is 16 Beneficial Spell Haste to a Fury's 7, though their spell haste is both beneficial and hostile, and the heal crit bonus from the 6 piece bonus (10 for Inq, 4 heal/8 spell for Furies.) Otherwise, Inq get an extra 3 crit and 2 base heals, while Furies get 85 more Heal Amount.

In that context, it is absolutely stupid that the Inquisitor TSO set gives the Inquisitor nothing at all to help with Melee DPS. And I think most would be happy to just get a decent amount of STR on each set piece.

__________________

the_mo

ok, i was gonna make a longish post about what the t2 shard bp proc did for me (was 4% of the heal parse on varsoon!) but i accidently the thumb button on my mouse, which did a browser_back and now im too lazy to type that shite again.

so in short: theres nothing wrong with a reactive proc at all... i mean like 4% of the heal parse for 1 item is not bad at all (considering the 1 OLH item i was wearing in that fight only did 1%)