Greetings Monks,
I have been studying the monk class vs bruiser class threads and have read through all of the combat art listings for each. From a purely raiding point of view I have come to the conclusion that a monk provides way more for a raid force than a bruiser.
-Group Hate reduction
-Haste 24 & 14.4% Casting speed - Raidwide
-Monk heal is raidwide, bruiser is self-only
-Group feign-death as opposed to self-only (Handy for learning encounters and getting everyone up quicker)
The arguements for a bruiser are as follows
-Drag - AA ability - Monks get peel now so no big loss
-Bruisers buff raidwide agression allowing taunts to land better and at the same time increase the amount of de-taunts. While this is nice to have our tanks are not having any difficulties with agro so this is no big loss. Especially considering that the monk will reduce the hate of his group which is mostly casters
-Higher DPS - I think we all agree that bruisers are higher DPS but IMO the raidwide dps will make up for this due to the faster casting speed and haste that monks bring. A small price to pay for the extra utility.
I have put all this to our bruiser and he has come back with one arguement that I cannot get around, which is where you guys come in

He claims that, since they have so much self-buffed haste and shit combat arts, monks do most of their DPS from auto-attack. This makes them an extremely boring class to play.
Is this true? What makes a monk interesting for you guys and do you think I am right to want him to betray?
Thank you in advance