Hugatrea

I figure this is the best place to ask this sort of question, so here goes

Which has the easiest time soloing between a melee mystic or a melee warden, Also what kind of things can each solo?

Thanks all

Hugatrea

OK sorry about this, i cant edit my above post for some reason, what i meant to ask was which solos better, a melee inquisitor or a melee warden, and what kind/Con of mobs each can take?

Thanks

hyelaw

The more info you give the more feedback you will get. What do you want to do, what is your playstyle? If you learn to play either class you can solo level pretty much anything. But if you want to solo, why are you wanting a healer?

Hugatrea

OK here goes, what im looking for is a healer that can solo well when i cant find a group, i dont like root nuking so my choices are limited to the mele healers.

Of the melee healers im wondering which can solo the best, I realise its largely subjective but what im asking for is oppinions and examples of the kind of things you can solo with your melee healers.

The reason I wanted a Healer Is because i have always played a healer in other MMO's and feel comfortable in this role within a group, maybe after i have been playing the game for a while i'll be tempted to try a different roll, Tank or cc maybe but untill then, healer is for me

Thanks all

Aerofae

Both warden, mystic, and inq will do good in soloing with melee spec.. the big difference between the classes is the type of healing they provide but that's about it (not speaking about later stages such as raids etc).

Joshisgreat

From personal experience with my Inq, I could really solo just about anything that would be considered solo-able. I could solo acadachism/nest/forgotton city at lvl 70. Definately the highest dps of all of those healers, just auto attacking alone with an inquis would out dps the rest of those healers, plus self buffed you can have as much as like 71 dps and about 120 haste, upper 60's double attack and 100% melee crit, those numbers are easily attainable, and can even get higher. I would expect the Inq to be more fun too, seeing that they are much more capable of dps'ing then the other 2, you bring a lot more to a group/raid and that extra aspect makes them very fun to play.

__________________

SacDaddy

I would say Inq too..but be warned... you're gonna need a fair amount of "suck time" put in to get the AA's an Inq needs to be good.

Up intil araound Lv 35 and 35 AA's it's real hard bringin up the Inq. Well worth it though.

__________________

Hugatrea

OK Thanks to all of you, looks like the inquisitor might be what im after, is it worth locking xp? im only 13 atm , also could someone explain the benefits of locking xp because at the moment i just dont get it?

Thanks

Israphil

There main reason to lock exp is to do as many quests as possible before they grey out...but you shouldn't do it. Even if you have quests go grey, you can always mentor down to turn em in for aa exp; only real reason to ever lock your exp imo is if you want to stay in a level range on pvp servers.

And regarding your original question, inq is definitely the way to go. And my opinion isn't biased at all.

__________________
Less newb, more pwn.

hyelaw

Inq is my suggestion also since that's my main.. But all 3 that were listed are soloable. As for locking exp. It's entirely up to you, in my opinion. If you want to get a fair amount of AAs early on, I would suggest doing so. If you are trying to level up as fast as possible, I'd keep it unlocked. Make sure you spec battle cleric. Best of luck.