Go Back   EQ2Flames Forum > General Discussion > Noob Questions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2009, 08:04 PM  
Lil Newbie
 

Posts: 2
Photos: (0)

Default Coercer vs Inquisitor

So, ive been reading everything I can but am unable to decide between coercer and inquisitor.

I read alot about coercer soloing and how good they are, but on the other hand I hear people saying they suck at lower levels untill they get a bunch of AA's and expect to die alot.

From reading about the Inquisitor it seems they are a slower soloer then coercer and probably cant solo the same content at 80.

Im more concerned about 1-80 game at the moment. How good are both of these classes at getting to 80?

From vague bits and pieces I get the feeling soloing from 1-80 with a coercer doesnt involve too much charming, and its more just root and nuke, is this assumtion correct? If so, when people say "coercers rule at soloing" are they really talking about high end content?

Inquisitor interests me because they sound like the best soloer from 1-80 of the healer classes (besides the druids) and they are actually wanted at 80. Also at 80 I would then have the option to betray to templar which sounds like a wanted class in groups.

How slow exactly are Inquisitors at leveling from 1-80? Is it a good pace?

Is anyone able to clarify some of the above for me and help me make an informed decision on what I should choose?

Cheers.

Last edited by pyre; 11-18-2009 at 08:05 PM.
pyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 03:29 AM  
Your roof is on fire.
 
SacDaddy's Avatar
 
Character: Sacdaddicus Is now just Sacdaddy
Guild: Dracos Argent / DAKKOTA'S SCHOOL FOR WZRDS
Server: BB / Funrest

Posts: 1,393
Photos: (7)

Default Re: Coercer vs Inquisitor

I've taken both classes from 1 to 80.

Coercer was more fun.

Both coercer and inq are wanted in groups at 80 so I dont think you can make a wrong decision between the two.
__________________

Hell Yes.
How I roll
. WIZARDS TILL WE DIE
SacDaddy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 10:22 AM  
Regular
 

Posts: 125
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Coercer vs Inquisitor

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyre View Post
How slow exactly are Inquisitors at leveling from 1-80? Is it a good pace?

Is anyone able to clarify some of the above for me and help me make an informed decision on what I should choose?

Cheers.
SacDaddy gets it right.

If you plan to stick to solo content, the advantages/disadvantages of each class are minimized. The 'coercer dies more often' occurs when the coercer is mucking with heroic content or pushing the boundaries.

I'd boil the differences down to the following:
- inquisitor feels slower since the pace of combat is slower. A good inqui uses a high-delay 2h weapon, and the 4-8s swing time feels slower than the ~1s casting time for 'chanter spells
- the 'chanter has more options when things go wrong: charm, mez, invis, etc. Of course, the 'chanter is also more vulnerable when things go wrong.
- the inqui bypasses content using soothe+invis totems; the chanter uses invis/charm/mez. About equal.
- inquis will spend more for equipment


Sadari
80 Illusionist
80 Inquisitor
Sadari is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Sponsor Ads


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifications by TMS