I am looking for input on which of two classes would fit me best. I have tried several up and am split between druid or inquisitor. Currently my druid is a fury bit would have no issue with betraying over. I enjoy healing with both but would like to focus and learn one class as best I can and gear up. So here is the question...
Which is the better soloer?
Which is more looked for in groups and raids?
Anything else you feel I should know about the two...
Thanks in advance for any feedback
wardens & inquis are more versatile in raids, a fury will generally only be in a mage group - it's unusual to have them in a tank group. all of the classes solo just fine
You'd prolly find templar slow to level if you're new. Is go inquis tbh
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
also.. defiler and fury imho is fastest to level up. warden is a bit slower due to the low dps.
but in end game both are great and fun to play![]()
::: Sataro (Defiler, main)
::: Satara (Warden, alt) - NihalX (Wizzy, alt)
Lol
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Luv my inquis. Capable healer (can handle just about any heroic content, and is capable of solo healing a raid group), and if set up right can actually put out a decent amount of DPS (often less than a fury, but with its detrimental protections, its much more survivable). Nuttin I luv more than gettin put in a raid group with a shaman, tossin out group reactives, then goin to town on the mob. It's no assassin, but it can still be fun.
warden+mystic is best healer combo for a melee group atm
Id rather mystic inquis tbh
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
than you don't know much about what a warden gives in comparison to a inq
how could one pass up that much CB and a proc that does basically the same as fac dev from inqs.
and no one really cares about the 10 MA, attack speed, and dps boosts inqs give nowadays to much
Tis true story. Haven't played in a while
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2