Wozamil

I didn't actually think about how it was calculating until you said that it was probably basing the damage off the low number in the spread instead of the high number. I'm not sure what the actual spell description said at the time of me casting the spell, but the first AE did a minimum of 104.5% of the high number of 1069 and the second AE did a minimum of 105.37% based on the low number of 614. Numbers slightly screwed I'm sure because my INT was higher and other various things. But those percentages are close enough to lead me to believe your right.

Also sent Aeralik a pm on Sony's boards. It's just a matter of him actually reading it and not assume it's spam like 99% of this pm's I'm sure he gets.

Good idea about the testing feedback board. I'll spam there as well as use some connections I have.

__________________