Opinion On AA Set Up - Page 2

Nardaak · 10-15-2007, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wozamil

I'd take the procs over the ward.

I usually only cast it before pull, but if I do cast it during the fight, it's not often enough to warrant a recast reduction. My job as an MT/OT is to do everything I can to hold agro, not keep myself alive. That's a healers job. Nevermind the interupt factor.

this is pretty much what i was getting at with my first post. I have the same setup has woz and i have had it for quite some time now, actually since i hit 100AAs so yeah. I cast ward on pull and only use it in getting close to oh shit situations after that.

Virutis · 10-15-2007, 03:39 PM

its pretty common that most use some variation of hero/wrath lines for eof aa's to go anything else imo is just plain stupid, now KoS is where it gets tricky, multiple specs for different rolls which we established over on test awhile back with the all paladin raid, it would just intail to what you do in your raid/groups, im off tank spec'd with agi/sta/int 4/4/8, imo the best solo/mt spec is full sta/int other than that there are many variations of support roles and dps roles, its a matter of going with what you feel comfortable with

NANEEJE · 10-31-2007, 05:23 AM

I love you guys, in a very non-gay way i love you guys...
I need to know if our OT role in raids and end game requires a lot of AoE?
I am finding that in this role, ( my chosen role) that I am setting up for that, 448 sta/agi/int.... no points in paladin tree cause i just learned we can put some in there. lol
if we do a lot of AoE, and that requires this type of set up, what are you gaining by your original post set up? Are you gaining just the spell crits? and is that enough to change the basic worldwide theory that 448 is the best set up. thanks

Lankyskater77 · 10-31-2007, 06:19 AM

Can we please Sticky one fucking How should I do my AA's shit so people know what we think BTW i Recomend the one were we have allready discussed the extra 40 aa we have allready on the forums. I don't Really like see 80 posts about the same thing........... STICKY FTW!!!!! (that way they can read omg what an idea!!!)

Kalath · 10-31-2007, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Virutis

its pretty common that most use some variation of hero/wrath lines for eof aa's to go anything else imo is just plain stupid

Just thought I'd let you know... if you're on a pvp server, going support over wrath is significantly stronger. The group mit buff is sexy for protecting mages, and cure is great for unmezing/uncharming your healers, and not to mention yourself.

But anyway, carry on.

Mahgnus · 11-04-2007, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalath

Just thought I'd let you know... if you're on a pvp server, going support over wrath is significantly stronger. The group mit buff is sexy for protecting mages, and cure is great for unmezing/uncharming your healers, and not to mention yourself.

But anyway, carry on.

Not that i play pvp but this makes me think wtf.. your saying pulling healer duties is better then all the aoe bonuses you get to pwn pvp groups ? Aren't locks infamous for being raid wipers? with all of our ae's and aoes up we are like mini locks = ) 6 aoes (sta line) and 1 ae is looking nice to me /shurg. If anything i would want to drop hero before wraths in a pvp setting.