Go Back   EQ2Flames Forum > Class Discussion > Paladins

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-19-2009, 05:56 PM  
Killing is my business and business is good
 
Character: Darkor
Guild: Midnight
Server: Venekor

Posts: 2,214
Photos: (0)

Send a message via ICQ to Ajjantis
Default Re: Stonewall

Need more support.
__________________
Ignorelist: Shade, Keili, Sinuz, Demron, Narkle, Pink Poodle, Lavir, Kradun, Ratface, Humi, Milambers, Zacii, Dreww, Shaided, Pletia, Sylvanking
http://www.eq2flames.com/profile.php?do=ignorelist

Originally Posted by Laume
I understood that LFG had admitted that he was formerly an addict, which isn't something anyone should be insulted for.
Ajjantis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 10:46 AM  
Just a gamer living in a virtual world
 
cimtaurus's Avatar
 
Character: Saplina (Mystic) and Aethen (Ranger)
Guild: Pandemonium
Server: Unrest

Posts: 65
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Stonewall

I bumped it with a general "WAAAAHHHHHH"

Not that it seems to matter much, but whatever.
cimtaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 06:11 PM  
The Paladin of Vox
 
Keado's Avatar
 
Character: Keado
Guild: Mayhem
Server: Vox

Posts: 3
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Stonewall

Hey everyone, got an idea for ya. start submitting in game feedback. and make sure to include the link to the official forum stonestronge gave us at the begining of this thread.

http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/p...opic_id=449374

there are GM's responsible for reading and acting to all feedback. and they have boss' that have to review everything to ensure stuffs getting done properly. if all uf us start doing this, then our issues will be heard from a different angle. and it will be harder for sony to ignore.

make sure to include the link to the forum in your feedback report. copy the link and use CTRL+V to post it in the report. sony might just be waiting till we get tired and roll over and die. if we pick it up and attack with renewed vigor, they might be forced to act before we come up with a more creative way to make there jobs harder. ive already rcruited my guild and other guilds on my server to assist in daily feedback reports to suport or cause.

i refuse to let sony screw me out of my endline ability. and i will not just lay here and die. lets stop sitting around and waiting for them to do something. lets make them notice that we want this fixed, sooner than later. start sending feedback reports.

also, if you already use stonewall, send a bug report saying that it doesnt work. they will have to spend money and time to investigate that it did or didnt work. be a neussance and force them to pay attention to us.
Keado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 09:41 PM  
Lil Newbie
 
Lionnhart's Avatar
 
Character: Lionnhart
Server: Permafrost

Posts: 7
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Stonewall

In game feedback sent :S
Lionnhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 10:17 AM  
Agent of Light
 
Character: Nunya
Guild: Nunya
Server: Crushbone

Posts: 7
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Stonewall

Yea... cant argue the lack of value on this spell fellas. But, I also cant understand why so many peeps play paladins who aspire to be guards, without considering that wisdom is meant to be the primary or 2ndry stat for this class. You know... wisdom, truth justice, holy warrior.. all that shit. So with that said, paladins' resistances should be considerably more important than avoidance," but not parry". So with more resistance, and less avoidance, the stonewall might look a little more valuable to you.
paladin007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 12:44 PM  
Lil Newbie
 
Character: Armengar
Guild: Lhug Hir
Server: Najena

Posts: 3
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Stonewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by paladin007 View Post
So with more resistance, and less avoidance, the stonewall might look a little more valuable to you.
with less avoidance it will look even less valuable to me

face it , this sucks, i mean sk's get 15 sec immunity+dps increase+hate

to sum it up, sk>>>>>>>>>zerk>guard>pally for tso endline abilities
i'd say that pally>guard if they didnt have that tower of stone to use with it if they need to

one of a couple things should happen, bring other endline tso up to sk's or bring it down to ours.
i would prefer the first, the sk one is worthy of spending that many aaxp to get to it, the other 3 classes are not.
Kaimyrrh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009, 08:58 AM  
Agent of Light
 
Character: Nunya
Guild: Nunya
Server: Crushbone

Posts: 7
Photos: (0)

Default Re: Stonewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaimyrrh View Post
with less avoidance it will look even less valuable to me

face it , this sucks, i mean sk's get 15 sec immunity+dps increase+hate

to sum it up, sk>>>>>>>>>zerk>guard>pally for tso endline abilities
i'd say that pally>guard if they didnt have that tower of stone to use with it if they need to

one of a couple things should happen, bring other endline tso up to sk's or bring it down to ours.
i would prefer the first, the sk one is worthy of spending that many aaxp to get to it, the other 3 classes are not.
i think some1 said it best, when they said, SK's have to be overpowered because their controllers are such nOObs. Aside from that, the class is getting nurfed soon anyways.
paladin007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Sponsor Ads


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifications by TMS