Summoners ever getting a fix? - Page 2

Miroh · 01-22-2008, 01:48 PM

Ratface · 01-22-2008, 01:49 PM

Necros are fine.

My first toon in EQ2, on Nagafen, was a Necromancer. They're fine.

Stop crying, learn to play.

The only thing that needs to be fixed about summoners is the people who play them.

Odinn · 01-22-2008, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beandip

Summoners dont need a fix at all... pet taunts in pvp are a mere distraction, you want to pump dps out, not try to outlast a scout that has probably twice your hitpoints, you DO get stoneskin, every mage does, do some repeatables, farm some shit and get the 4 stoneskin items, I don't get why everyone says summoners are so "suck", even though they don't shine through like other classes they are quite solid when played properly.

I agree here, go DPS, not defense. Beef up your pets through AA's, I know conj can pretty good, not sure about necro. Kill fast ftw.

Zacii · 01-22-2008, 07:26 PM

I think that summoners need a total nerf tbh. They get a pet that does dps. Do I, NO. They get awesome spell nukes. Do I? NO. They get something that taunts people off them, do I? NO. They get awesome swarm pets. DO I? NO. They get innate fd. DO I? NO. They get to distribute tokens to everyone else in the game. DO I? NO.

Nerf Summoners, they are way op and need to be toned down.

Calbiyum · 01-22-2008, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zacii

I think that summoners need a total nerf tbh. They get a pet that does dps. Do I, NO. They get awesome spell nukes. Do I? NO. They get something that taunts people off them, do I? NO. They get awesome swarm pets. DO I? NO. They get innate fd. DO I? NO. They get to distribute tokens to everyone else in the game. DO I? NO.

Nerf Summoners, they are way op and need to be toned down.

I was about to be like ya gay then i lol'd

aeeron · 01-23-2008, 01:46 AM

LivePvP - Make Digital History.
when i cared about pvp~.

If conjurors have 3-6seconds to cast some temp buffs on pet they are excellent (let me cast these spells on the move and conjurors would be a lot more evened out with other mage type classes.) Necros are another story atleast there tank pet gets some CC effects if you live 10seconds.

Dracot · 01-23-2008, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ratface

Necros are fine.

My first toon in EQ2, on Nagafen, was a Necromancer. They're fine.

Stop crying, learn to play.

The only thing that needs to be fixed about summoners is the people who play them.

Fraps your necro at 70-80 owning face and I'll goi L2P otherwise your statement is nothing more than bullshit. The same line we get from scouts daily on both forums, who are too scared to let their precious token vendors have a chance in pvp.

Dracot · 01-23-2008, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Odinn

I agree here, go DPS, not defense. Beef up your pets through AA's, I know conj can pretty good, not sure about necro. Kill fast ftw.

Conj have more burst dps than necro. We have DOTS...(DAMAGE OVER TIME) and one nuke for about 1kish if not resisted, there is no possible way to FAST killa s a necro. We are not Designed to kill fast.

Nihlathak · 01-23-2008, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beandip

Summoners dont need a fix at all... pet taunts in pvp are a mere distraction, you want to pump dps out, not try to outlast a scout that has probably twice your hitpoints, you DO get stoneskin, every mage does, do some repeatables, farm some shit and get the 4 stoneskin items, I don't get why everyone says summoners are so "suck", even though they don't shine through like other classes they are quite solid when played properly.

people give you the answers to your problems Dracot and all you do is piss and moan about how you're not good enough to take down scouts. What do you expect us to do, say "Oh okay, yeah you're right necros sure do suck because you're a retard. I'll go buy a tin shortsword and fight you with it now just to make it fair" ?

Zacii · 01-23-2008, 03:18 PM

since weapons dont touch ca dps afaik im pretty sure I could still own a summoner with a tin shortsword.