Laodaron - is he a spammer? - Page 2

guapo1 · 09-10-2007, 10:38 AM

Yes he is annoying. yes he does troll. As far as spam goes i think he just replies to much.I do not think he is a spammer though. That is just my opinion.

Ps i dont even care for the guy much.But i agree with him he is not a spammer.

Laodaron · 09-10-2007, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Illuminator

That's the problem I have. If you're not engaged in the game, you have little more legitimacy participating here than if I gave this URL to the pope. I would overlook just about all of this if not for that.

But I am engaged in the game. There just isn't that much left to say about EOF. I'm a Conjuror, and we're pretty set. I just don't participate in the majority bulk of useless posts that will be outdated in 6-8 weeks that pertain to gameplay.

Orochan · 09-10-2007, 10:42 AM

Ya LFG, I mean I'm not saying laodaron is/is not a spammer, but your poll options are really skewed.

First of all I doubt a lot of people would say that you need to be put in check LFG, so by that reasoning alone they won't vote for that option.

This poll won't prove anything really, other then who doesn't like laodaron.

Illuminator · 09-10-2007, 10:44 AM

Oh, I thought you were one of those who quit but hung on in the afterlife.

Widem · 09-10-2007, 10:55 AM

spammer, sometimes

troll, meh:if you mean looking for threads he can comment on, yes

i don't really think lao's spamming is really what its intended to be. He posts in a manner that is very similar to real life dialogue, which doesnt really work on a message board very well w/o making it look like spam. He normally doesnt comment on stuff that ive seen him have no idea about, IE posting on some kind of game mechanic where he is definately wrong and then runs it into the ground. He sticks to lots of stuff in the everything else section which is pretty much fair game. Maybe we just dont cross paths very often, but ive never seen him say something that wasn't at least directed to the topic on a regular basis.

SillyMonkey · 09-10-2007, 10:57 AM

I'll admit ahead of time that Lao is a total asshole (there's more than a few of them on this site) but to call him a spammer on this site? Please, Lao doesn't spam near as much childish bullshit garbage as Faabio* does, and yet you vindicated him. As a matter of fact, from reading through a lot of the posts, I see more serious crap from him than I have of Faabio. That being the case, as much as I think he's a total douchebag, I'm afraid I have to use the Chewbacca defense here

"...If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.

*Note that this is not meant to start a smear Faabio campaign or anything. There are people on this site I hate FAR worse than him. He's just a good comparison for this argument is all.

Bruised · 09-10-2007, 11:04 AM

Questioning the legitimacy of a poster based upon perceived contributions to a gaming forum that is named....get this, that is named EQ2FLAMES, is a pretty fucking comic viewpoint.

I guess he'd have far more legitimacy in the eyes of the viewership if he, say, argued with Pinski all winter in seemingly every thread that popped up....ring a bell, Lumi?

We need yet another forum category. It should be named "The Internet: Serious Business."

Senelin · 09-10-2007, 11:06 AM

I also will agree that the poll options do not depict an accurate representation of most peoples opinion.

Is Laodaron a douche? Probably

Is he a reprehensible evil dirty commie nazi spammer? Not so much.

Does LFG suck the fat one and need to DIAF? Not so much either.

Should people leave the gameplay discussions to gameplay? Most definitely.

Illuminator · 09-10-2007, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruised

Questioning the legitimacy of a poster based upon perceived contributions to a gaming forum that is named....get this, that is named EQ2FLAMES, is a pretty fucking comic viewpoint.

I guess he'd have far more legitimacy in the eyes of the viewership if he, say, argued with Pinski all winter in seemingly every thread that popped up....ring a bell, Lumi?

We need yet another forum category. It should be named "The Internet: Serious Business."

Sorry, what was that again?

RadarX · 09-10-2007, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruised

Questioning the legitimacy of a poster based upon perceived contributions to a gaming forum that is named....get this, that is named EQ2FLAMES, is a pretty fucking comic viewpoint.

I guess he'd have far more legitimacy in the eyes of the viewership if he, say, argued with Pinski all winter in seemingly every thread that popped up....ring a bell, Lumi?

We need yet another forum category. It should be named "The Internet: Serious Business."

Well then I guess we need to have LFG remove the Everything Else and
Other Videogames forums then.