 |
|
03-15-2008, 04:58 PM
|
|
|
Pixel Pervert
Character: Fuck off SOE
Guild: Sold to GMWORKER.COM
Server: Hello Kitty Online
Posts: 647
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nafawo
If you don't care about being taken "seriously" then why do you get so butt hurt when someone calls you out on your mistakes and/or your retarded misinformed statements?
|
Nicely put.
Staccato, you refuse to grasp the idea that not only did LFG delete that post but at that point he also changed the policies of this site to prevent that from happening again. You accused him of the opposite earlier and now you are backpedaling saying 'well it doesn't matter because he had control of this site' and should have been punished for an incident that he put a stop to and took steps to prevent it from happening again.
I did not call you a noob with no real eq2/eq2flames experience, I merely pointed out that it is as easy to assume such that as it was for you to keep making your ammended flames to this site. You are crying and whining here like a petulant child. Be of some real use and click some of these ads.
I see now that you have ammended your complaint that this information was posted and continues to be update. Good going. Your complaint is noted and I will do with it exactly what has been done by Sony with suggestions about improving the game and some of the other programs they have going.
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:12 PM
|
|
|
<3
Character: Asria/Peachie/Anira
Guild: Troops of Doom
Server: Guk
Posts: 33
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
hey... stalking devs is boring. i'm going to stalk the op on this rar
__________________
HealTeam Asria!
80 Mystic
80 Templar
80 Fury
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:16 PM
|
|
|
Custom User Title
Character: Staccato Rythms
Server: Befallen
Posts: 38
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3devious
Nicely put.
Staccato, you refuse to grasp the idea that not only did LFG delete that post but at that point he also changed the policies of this site to prevent that from happening again. You accused him of the opposite earlier and now you are backpedaling saying 'well it doesn't matter because he had control of this site' and should have been punished for an incident that he put a stop to and took steps to prevent it from happening again.
I did not call you a noob with no real eq2/eq2flames experience, I merely pointed out that it is as easy to assume such that as it was for you to keep making your ammended flames to this site. You are crying and whining here like a petulant child. Be of some real use and click some of these ads.
I see now that you have ammended your complaint that this information was posted and continues to be update. Good going. Your complaint is noted and I will do with it exactly what has been done by Sony with suggestions about improving the game and some of the other programs they have going.
|
Oh yeah, I'm crying like a petulant child because what? I keep replying to your comments to me? what? did you think I was just gonna ignore what you said and move on? As you said, I'm actively participating in the thread. I'm not going to just outright start flaming people I don't know just because it's the flames section of the site. That might be what you do but I don't know, even it's merely "just the internet" there's a certain level of respect I try to keep when participating in forum boards. I merely commented on your rather ignorant, ignorance comment on the first poster that I commented on and agreed with his or her opinion.
I understood quite well that LFG deleted the post and changed his rules. However, the fact remains that it was posted and that it was against SOE rules and it got him kicked off the program. The ones that are butthurt about it are you guys. That's why the information was reposted on the site after he received the e-mail. That's why there's a RAR post about it. That's why you all (generally speaking, not you personally) raised so much hell and went to digg.com and other sites for pats on the back and support. That's why you guys are so defensive about this issue. What I don't buy is all of the bullshit excuses as to why it's been put back up. No one can admit it. But whatever, go ahead and call me out on a mistake I made misreading a commnent I had also admitted to and apologized for, call me a noob and dismiss anything I say because since it's not what you like to hear, it doesn't mean shit.
Last edited by Staccato; 03-15-2008 at 05:18 PM.
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:20 PM
|
|
|
░▒▓╘ß○▓▒░
Server: Permafrost
Posts: 1,485
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staccato
However, the fact remains that it was posted and that it was against SOE rules and it got him kicked off the program.
|
Please link the evidence to this fact.
__________________
~.......This site is now FFA against SOE.......Since The Good Way is no longer an option, we now shift our format to The Bad Way.......
........let them know the meaning of dissatisfied customers.........~
-LFG
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:25 PM
|
|
|
L337 Poster
Character: Echo Location
Guild: Retired
Posts: 2,134
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Wait... So Staccato is saying that because something that is against SOE rules was posted on a non funded, non run, site and then was deleted by the proprietor of the site that the proprietor was dismissed from an SOE program?
Even though there has been the communication between the community management and lfg posted showing a different reason?
Even though there has been the other evidence showing that that communication was just a sham to cover up even worse two faced dealings on SOE's community management's part?
Staccato, you fail, bad.
Might want to atleast have a correct timeline, correct evidence and correct... logic(see first paragraph of this post) before you try to spin this away from being SOE:EQ2 community management's fault.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talonis
Instead of arguing with your doctorate in Wikipedia, I'll offer a little insight.
|
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:28 PM
|
|
|
░▒▓╘ß○▓▒░
Server: Permafrost
Posts: 1,485
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Quote:
Originally Posted by pagansaint
Wait... So Staccato is saying that because something that is against SOE rules was posted on a non funded, non run, site and then was deleted by the proprietor of the site that the proprietor was dismissed from an SOE program?
Even though there has been the communication between the community management and lfg posted showing a different reason?
Even though there has been the other evidence showing that that communication was just a sham to cover up even worse two faced dealings on SOE's community management's part?
Staccato, you fail, bad.
Might want to atleast have a correct timeline, correct evidence and correct... logic(see first paragraph of this post) before you try to spin this away from being SOE:EQ2 community management's fault.
|
See Stucco? This is what everybody else is getting from your babble.
__________________
~.......This site is now FFA against SOE.......Since The Good Way is no longer an option, we now shift our format to The Bad Way.......
........let them know the meaning of dissatisfied customers.........~
-LFG
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:42 PM
|
|
|
Custom User Title
Character: Staccato Rythms
Server: Befallen
Posts: 38
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Quote:
Originally Posted by pagansaint
Wait... So Staccato is saying that because something that is against SOE rules was posted on a non funded, non run, site and then was deleted by the proprietor of the site that the proprietor was dismissed from an SOE program?
Even though there has been the communication between the community management and lfg posted showing a different reason?
Even though there has been the other evidence showing that that communication was just a sham to cover up even worse two faced dealings on SOE's community management's part?
Staccato, you fail, bad.
Might want to atleast have a correct timeline, correct evidence and correct... logic(see first paragraph of this post) before you try to spin this away from being SOE:EQ2 community management's fault.
|
Actually, it was my fault for trying to do this at work and not reading my edited comment before I hit the button
for what it's worth, the original comment:
I understood quite well that LFG deleted the post and changed his rules. However, the fact remains that it was posted in retaliation to SOE for doing something that was against SOE rules and it got him kicked off the program yet no one will admit it.
anyway, whatever, it doesn't really matter now. Credibility is shot so it's all babble. I just wanted to see someone to just say "yes, we posted it because SOE kicked us off the program"
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:52 PM
|
|
|
L337 Poster
Character: Echo Location
Guild: Retired
Posts: 2,134
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Your timeline is still off.
Your information is still incorrect.
Your logic is still swiss cheese.
Nothing posted is anything that is not obtainable from other public websites, or communications that one of the two parties involved in the non NDA covered communication posted.
So you're saying that posting of publicly available information on this site lead to the removal of LFG from the Influencer Program despite the communication between him and the community staff, despite what Brenlo has posted on the official forums, and finall despite what other people have shown that this was all double dealing to remove dev's from posting on this forum?
So despite all of that, LFG was removed from the Influencer Program because someone else posted a Dev's ingame character name then had that post deleted by LFG?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talonis
Instead of arguing with your doctorate in Wikipedia, I'll offer a little insight.
|
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 02:45 AM
|
|
|
Regular
Character: Rentok
Server: Hyperborea (AoC PvP RP)
Posts: 258
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
LOL it's Vaeamdar, let the awkward advances begin.
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 02:59 AM
|
|
|
L337 Poster
Character: Echo Location
Guild: Retired
Posts: 2,134
|
Re: LFG and Snark - EQ2Flames
Way to bump this when I had killed it. You fail sir.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talonis
Instead of arguing with your doctorate in Wikipedia, I'll offer a little insight.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|