Savin/Slappa, of Uprising, on Kithicor. - Page 8

Thelka · 07-25-2007, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rinion

Many people disagree with you. I've made an ass of my self on more then one occasion, Thanks though.

Asses make the world go round, idiots just make the world degrade.

Sharpteath · 07-25-2007, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rinion

Ah, Understood.

Was that an attempt to assert yourself as the victor without actually proving me wrong?
Thought you were smooth with that 'I know and you think' line huh?

If you are going to ignore my questions and play it off like that, as well assert that we will never agree anyway, refrain from declaring yourself the winner.
Either we both think or we both know. Do not put words into my mouth and quit trying to impose your egocentric personality on me.

If you want to prove that I only think im right and that you are right, show everyone proof and present your evidence. Or would you rather keep misleading the argument until its been obscured so much that no one remembers the original topic?

I am the egocentric one? If you believe I am wrong and I believe you are wrong then we "Disagree" (dis·a·gree:to fail to agree; differ).Let me make it very simple for you. I agree to disagree. Simple enough for you? How do you agree to disagree and declare anyone a winner? Secondly, thinking you could ever be a winner on a forum is asinine in itself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thelka

Why are people like Rinion the minority? Why must idiots like Sharpteath be the majority?

Yup I am a idiot, I defend my guild members. I use a forum as a form of entertainment. When I disagree I am not a little white sheep in a flock of morons. Your point well taken sir. Keep up your insightful probe into my personality. Majority?

Thelka · 07-25-2007, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharpteath

Yup I am a idiot, I defend my guild members. I use a forum as a form of entertainment. When I disagree I am not a little white sheep in a flock of morons. Your point well taken sir. Keep up your insightful probe into my personality. Majority?

Yes, it is fact that people like you, idiots who have to take the obvious out of context to make their side of the argument seem better, have the majority over smart people.

kascall · 07-25-2007, 05:10 PM

just boot slappa and we can call the thread dead

Legate · 07-25-2007, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kascall

just boot slappa and we can call the thread dead

I know I personally don't have the power to declare the thread over.
Seeing as many drama hungering people will want to say something or argue over an error in someones post but I believe this thread should die.
Sharpteeth is correct in the fact that, yes, I believe that Slappa will be handled correctly.
Whether or not Sharpteeth likes it though, eventually if its not resolved I won't be the one making a retard thread. It'll be someone else thats went overboard on Slappa.
So, if I may offer some advice to you guys, I say just wait. Surely there will always be more rate a retard threads to read on everyone else. Just wait, if Slappa is handled correctly we won't ever speak of him again, we'd have no reason to.
If he isn't, well, I'm sure there will be many more threads like this one (Except I'm a horrible flamer so they'll be better

)

Kimzar · 07-25-2007, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rinion

Many people disagree with you. I've made an ass of my self on more then one occasion, Thanks though.

I must agree there but attlist you man engthe to say so and not go around claiming treads being ended when they have barely cooled down a couple of hours...

so as the other said more people like you would be better

Sharpteath · 07-26-2007, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thelka

Yes, it is fact that people like you, idiots who have to take the obvious out of context to make their side of the argument seem better, have the majority over smart people.

Majority, I don’t agree. The majority of people are like you. They “try” to impose some simplistic nonsense about their superiority. Attacking someone for a differing opinion is the first sign of a weak mind. You call people dumb for not following the masses like blind idiots. You talk about taking things out of context? You come to a forum, read a couple pages and made an assessment about someone based on couple lines of text. You drew a conclusion and then commented on that conclusion with certainty. You might check that statement for who you should have been directing it. Keep up your great diatribe. I know a lot of people enjoy how much fun it is to read your wonderful gibberish. Please continue to delve deeper into your interpretation of my online persona. The more you say the more telling of you own flaws. Since you have made such a great appraisal of me, please let me return the favor over your next few posts. Please feel free to provide me fuel for my next post.

oddyophile · 07-26-2007, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thelka

Yes, it is fact that people like you, idiots who have to take the obvious out of context to make their side of the argument seem better, have the majority over smart people.

I haven't read this entire thread, so I don't know the breadth of your misconceptions, but this seems like a good place to start. The majority is comprised of people who think they are they smart, but fail to understand that everything written is taken out of context. You can either get angry at people for "not getting" you, or you can be smart about it and try to find what context the people you are trying to talk to are operating from and reach them on that level.

It's much easier to insult people though.

Rinion · 07-26-2007, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharpteath

I am the egocentric one? If you believe I am wrong and I believe you are wrong then we "Disagree" (dis·a·gree:to fail to agree; differ).Let me make it very simple for you. I agree to disagree. Simple enough for you? How do you agree to disagree and declare anyone a winner? Secondly, thinking you could ever be a winner on a forum is asinine in itself.

You did NOT say it anything like "I believe you are wrong and you believe I am wrong" You said "you think your right and I know your wrong." Which implied you were trying to claim some sort of victory by stating that I was wrong and that by default made you right.

If you were trully agreeing to disagree that phrase should of been "You think your right and I think your wrong" or replace both thinks with know.

Sharpteath · 07-26-2007, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rinion

You did NOT say it anything like "I believe you are wrong and you believe I am wrong" You said "you think your right and I know your wrong." Which implied you were trying to claim some sort of victory by stating that I was wrong and that by default made you right.

If you were trully agreeing to disagree that phrase should of been "You think your right and I think your wrong" or replace both thinks with know.

Well sir, actually I know you “think” you are right, but I do not agree. You “know” you are right (in your opinion) so you “think” I am wrong. Do you see where I am going with this or next post should I draw a map? A simple matter of semantics, yet the point was the same. Why would I confirm your point at all? Like I said very simple “I agree to disagree”, better known as “ I don’t agree with you and you don’t agree with me”. Little off topic but hey, we left the topic behind days ago