Xanoth

It says "a successful attack", it does not say "any successful attack"

There is a big difference, and I'm sure I'm not the only one that would prefer this change to a 5% increase.

__________________

Deule

To clarify what Xanoth said, relentless hunger only procs off of melee type attacks. The change that most of us would like to see done is having a chance that it proc off of any type of attack, whether it is spell or CA. Right now being loaded into the optimum group for us looks more mage based, and most of the people in the group get nothing from relentless hunger. Not to mention that being 50/50 on CA's and spells...we really do not get that much out of RH either.

Doomjudge

then its totally fucked up .. bah .. I thought it would say "melee" if it was melee only .. please SOE get couple more closer looks at Shadowknights

Xanoth

It's not melee only. It's Melee and Ranged auto attack only.

__________________

Mallec

Overall it's nice to see spell and combat arts damage together (finally).

With that said, IMO I'd rather see Spell Crit and/or Shield Block vise + DPS and/or Attack Speed. Also I was slightly disappointed seeing the sabatons and gussets with the same effect.

Spaulders: change for +7 Spell Crit Chance and +50 to spell and combat arts damage.
Sabatons: change for 5% Shield Block Chance.

Terra

Don't know if this is the right place to type this but getting the set legs for my alt and noticing that the 8% bonus to unholy arms does not stack with aa for the same spell made me very sad It was 13% with aa and 16% with legs but not 21% with both as it should. Or have I misunderstood something?

__________________

Xanoth

Like most things, you can't improve more than 100% of the base value. So if 8% is the base value, 16% seems right. I play my SK so little I didn't even notice

__________________