Most truthfull sig ever - Page 2

Kaladryn · 07-07-2008, 07:43 PM

I just want to raid, but everybody's prejudiced against SK's.

At the expense of sounding like a broken record, the sig is right on.

Seolta · 07-08-2008, 02:51 PM

We've told em I don't know how many fucking times how to easily fix us.

Honestly, when I hear that they have a dev "playing" an SK in order to look into the class it makes me even MORE apprehensive.

Fucker will prolly be running around soloing shit as a level 50 and come to the conclusion that we are overpowered and nerf us even more.

I wish I were kidding.

Arkanis · 07-08-2008, 06:27 PM

I feel the same way. I used to be angry at the 2-3 devs that played the class for 2-3 years in high end raiding guilds, load up on contested raid drops and act like the class is working as intended and dont tell their co-workers that the class needed serious looking at.

Then a month or 2 of angry thoughts later i realised the truth.. that these devs cant say this class is broken because when the other devs ask how they know they have to admit playing the class and besides the shame of playing something besides a guardian or assassin.

After that they would prob get a slap on the wrists for using dev strats to have advantage on content.... oh wait that did happen but without the fix ....

I guess the fix for the class truly is contested raid loots and not patches.

Zehl · 07-16-2008, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seolta

Honestly, when I hear that they have a dev "playing" an SK in order to look into the class it makes me even MORE apprehensive.

There has been at least one (fairly well known?) EQ2 Dev in a top world raiding guild for a few years. He hasn't been playing to look into the class, he was raiding because he wanted to. Yes, raiding. He is not a class dev though, there may be others but I'm not familiar with them.

That fact kind of makes you feel more dismal, that they ignored requests all this time from their own office to improve a class to be on par with others.