Aeralik's Fucking With Deathmarch Now...

Seolta · 01-22-2009, 11:51 AM

I'd suggest you guys start checking test feedback a couple times a day for updates, and GDMF "/testcopy add" if you haven't already and give some feedback....REAL feedback not just reactionary QQ and shit.

As far as specifics, DM has been going back and forth on test between castable and not castable with Off stance...where this is leading we don't know but we need WW SK's to test and give feedback so we don't get totally fucked over with all this stance crap.

ShadowKnight changes 1/22/09

Satris · 01-22-2009, 01:49 PM

Ugh, I really don't like where this is going all of a sudden.

Ramone · 01-22-2009, 01:53 PM

He's a fucking douchebag.

Illuminator · 01-22-2009, 02:20 PM

omg AHAHAHAHAHHA

dakkota · 01-22-2009, 02:31 PM

Illuminator · 01-22-2009, 02:57 PM

Paladins lose Amends, what makes you think you get to keep Deathmarch?

detras · 01-22-2009, 03:27 PM

Welcome to the world of the Rangers.

Summoned Arrow, Stream of Arrows! Need I say more?

At least you aren't his competitive class. Assassins=Rangers

Deule · 01-22-2009, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Illuminator

Paladins lose Amends, what makes you think you get to keep Deathmarch?

God I hope they force your fucking class to choose between utility and DPS than fuck you if you try to do either at the same time.

Death March is a DPS increaser for the group, that happens to have a side effect of increasing hate since you are buffing the group. So how does it make sense to not be able to use it in offensive? If SOE really didn't want us to have the hate from this in offensive than they could make it so you don't get hate when using it in offensive...fucking genius. However, due to being in offensive it takes a serious hit to hate anyway, negative hate gain in the offensive stance makes sure of that.

Also, what is the low down on the stance cast changes? Is it just a longer recast to go back into the same stance? Like if I take off defensive stance, is the recast of defensive stance 5 sec or something? If it effects going from offensive to defensive, and it takes 5 sec to get to the other stance than that is a serious issue as well. That means OT'ing becomes even more of a bitch job since, wow you gotta wait to pick shit up if you are actually trying to dps on the raid. Furthermore, offensive stance needs more of a boost if this is true. If they are trying to make it so that it is extremely hard to stance dance on raids, than offensive calls for T1 dps, otherwise back to once again 2 fighters on a raid 95% of the time.

Illuminator · 01-22-2009, 03:36 PM

I know you don't hope that because what goes around comes around.

If they wanted any of this to make sense, then offensive would be the supreme mode of generating aggro. And defensive stance wouldn't be long-term but more of an oh-shit, and there wouldn't be this 5 second recast bullshit.

Chix · 01-22-2009, 03:52 PM

Man, they are making shit so much more complicated then they'd have to. Just put a significant negative hatemod on offensive stance, that's all you need to do.