Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarek
I totally get what you're saying with this, but I don't understand your numbers....
first duel was 410 to 479 on 21 triggers. Then I did the same thing except I procced the Claymore before casting the reactive. Range that time: 409 to 473 on 9 triggers. So, confirmed.
Duel 1 (w/o claymore proc) 410-479
Duel 2 (w/ claymore proc) 409-473
How is the ractive in your example better with the claymore proc? or was there a typo?
|
Right, there is no difference. If your claymore proc is up, and you cast your reactive, it doesn't do anything for you.
All, I was saying is that Rarok is 100% right. And there is the proof.
I'm not 100% sure, but i think it wasn't always that way. It used to be that if your claymore proc was up, and you cast your reactive, that reactive would tick 20% higher each tick for the next 5 or 9 ticks.