Go Back   EQ2Flames Forum > Class Discussion > Troubadors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-26-2007, 01:54 PM  
LFJ
 
Slamdar's Avatar
 
Character: Slamdar
Guild: Revelations - FNF
Server: Kithicor

Posts: 1,432
Photos: (0)

Send a message via MSN to Slamdar
Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

Supposedly Zander's was fixed 2-3 LUs ago.
__________________
Being a casual scrub
Slamdar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 02:32 PM  
Not now chief, I'm in the fuckin' zone
 
Character: Kouros (QUITTER!!!)
Guild: Stasis 4 EVA
Server: Nektulos RIP Bazaar FTW

Posts: 223
Photos: (0)

Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

Really? Don't remember reading or hearing that they did. well...that only took like 20 LUs then lol
__________________
Kouros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 02:59 PM  
LFJ
 
Slamdar's Avatar
 
Character: Slamdar
Guild: Revelations - FNF
Server: Kithicor

Posts: 1,432
Photos: (0)

Send a message via MSN to Slamdar
Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

It happened in the LU that they used a dirge spell as a reference to clear up their crappy description.
__________________
Being a casual scrub
Slamdar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 03:07 PM  
Done
 
Character: Calaglin
Guild: Dissolution
Server: Nektulos

Posts: 12,236
Photos: (0)

Send a message via ICQ to Pinski Send a message via AIM to Pinski Send a message via MSN to Pinski Send a message via Yahoo to Pinski
Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kouros View Post
Figured I would give this a bump and ask if Zander's is still broken....

And also, yea removing the stifle from PoTM would be nice. Especially since our counterpart's CoB doesn't have a stifle.
Daze you mean :P
__________________
Calaglin, Former Illusionist/Guild Leader of Dissolution on Nektulos
Calaglin, Former Illusionist/Guild Leader of Confirmed on Unrest
Pinski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 03:32 PM  
Not now chief, I'm in the fuckin' zone
 
Character: Kouros (QUITTER!!!)
Guild: Stasis 4 EVA
Server: Nektulos RIP Bazaar FTW

Posts: 223
Photos: (0)

Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

Yea...lol...I wouldnt mind the root if it was gone too
__________________
Kouros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 11:28 AM  
Chief Smacka`Ho
 
Yerfdog's Avatar
 
Character: Yerfdog
Guild: Retired
Server: Guk

Posts: 41
Photos: (0)

Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

2 things I would like to see changed and not sure if they have been mentioned or not in here. But for #1 remove the conc slot for Bria's, why do we have to us eup one when illusionists and coercers mana do not require one slot. And for #2 I don't mind a conc slot on our self buff but I would like to see a + skils to it.
__________________
7 P's Piss poor planning promotes poor playing performance!!
Yerfdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 12:28 PM  
Only You can prevent a Forum Fire
 
Ballads's Avatar
 
Character: Burnttoast/Baconram
Guild: NPU
Server: Guk/Vox

Posts: 1,830
Photos: (0)

Send a message via AIM to Ballads
Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yerfdog View Post
2 things I would like to see changed and not sure if they have been mentioned or not in here. But for #1 remove the conc slot for Bria's, why do we have to us eup one when illusionists and coercers mana do not require one slot. And for #2 I don't mind a conc slot on our self buff but I would like to see a + skils to it.
This approach to fixing are self buff has been mentioned before. Would you prefer the con slot requirement be taken off or would you prefer it be made worth using a con slot on it ? I personally don't think skills + melee is enough to justify the con slot. Needs to be both that and the proc made offensive. Then you would also have to add in another one that was defensive. With maybe agi and sta instead of int , a reactive proc, and + to parry. These to me sound like the perfect bard stances basically.Of course it would have to be restricted to the same timer so you can only have one up. Instead of having the traditional negatives that the other classes get are negative is it cost a con slot to run the stance.
Ballads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 12:42 PM  
Chief Smacka`Ho
 
Yerfdog's Avatar
 
Character: Yerfdog
Guild: Retired
Server: Guk

Posts: 41
Photos: (0)

Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

Sorry what I meant to say on Bria's is why are we required a conc slot when enchanters are not. I would like to see the slot taken by it removed. Also as far as our self buff goes I would like to see a +35ish or somewhere in that area to +slash crush and pierce added in there and leave it as is with a conc slot for the self buff.

***Just re-read what you had mentioned about 2 different stances and they make sense to me. Thing that just bugs the shit out of me is if I need to run any of our other group buffs depending on situation 9 times out of 10 its my self buff I drop to run it. Now I know most will just say drop the str/sta buff but for me personally on the way I built my guy str is my weak link and I can never afford to drop that***
__________________
7 P's Piss poor planning promotes poor playing performance!!

Last edited by Yerfdog; 04-27-2007 at 12:49 PM.
Yerfdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 01:35 PM  
Visitor
 
Character: Teldea
Guild: hiatus
Server: hiatus

Posts: 57
Photos: (0)

Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

i don't know how unusual this idea is but
i was thinking of having a , let's say yet another buff ,
adding a very small amount of power for example to the group
each time the troub uses a CA / spell .
Small amount of hate reduction would rock, and having this effect
added to an almost useless buff like dove song would be even better

This way i'd know my spamming would not only be worth an extra 500 dps.

if something like this was allready posted i apologize, as i "flew over" the
pages.

like many i do think that PotM should not daze and root,
and mana regen and self buff would be better without the concentration slot.
Teldea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 09:48 AM  
><((((°>
 
Terra's Avatar
 
Character: tenneth
Guild: validus
Server: splitpaw

Posts: 640
Photos: (0)

Default Re: What would you like to see done for Troubs...

Remove root and daze from precision. Aand the stances Ballads wrote about sound nice, hehe. Also, wouldn't it be nice if requiem had a chance to absorb spells instead of having a chance for a spell to proc it so next spell would be absorbed like quite a few have mentioned before :P

Oh, something needs to be done about the stealth attack too I think, not sure what exactly though. Currently, I don't see very many using it after maybe using it on pull.
Terra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Sponsor Ads


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifications by TMS