Emolad

and, kalgore got the plat because he dted some noob in kunzar!

__________________

Vydar

This is not the way that Weechoo typically talks.

After having been friends with him for some 6 months or so, he has never once typed so eloquently, posted whole paragraphs, or used bigger than tri-syllabic words.

He's copy pasting something and editing it.

__________________

weechoo

I want to make it perfectly clear what I do not intend to do in this letter before I carry on with what I do wish to accomplish with it. What follows is a series of remarks addressed to the readers of this letter and to Cory himself. It may not seem to be very important right now, but if anything will free us from the shackles of his stinking words, it's knowledge of the world as it really is. It's knowledge that we must convince the government to clamp down hard on Cory's methods of interpretation. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to counteract the subtle, but pervasive, social message that says that Cory knows 100% of everything 100% of the time.
I almost forgot: Cory keeps telling everyone within earshot that children should belong to the state. I'm guessing that Cory read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of abusive stereotypes. If you wonder why I take the stance that I do, it's because like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Cory ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. Unfortunately, he tends to utter so much verbiage about scapegoat ism that I can conclude only that Cory's suggestions are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're totally insincere, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, Cory is inherently vile, infernal, and uncongenial. Oh, and he also has a foul mode of existence.
If you were to try to tell Cory's henchmen that he gives new meaning to the word "rotten", they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that if Cory doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. I'm willing to accept that he represents a new breed of predaceous truculent-types. I'm even willing to accept that he has a penchant for counterinsurgency and clandestine operations. But he doesn't want us to know about his plans to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate. Otherwise, we might do something about that. In summary, it is my prayer that people everywhere will join me in my quest to pronounce the truth and renounce the lies.

__________________

Emolad

WHAT THE FUCK??!!?!

__________________

Vydar

Every word in your last post was monosyllabic.

__________________

Emolad

whatthesuperzomgroflcopterfuckingwowz?!!

__________________

Vydar

A number of incidents have taken place in the last several weeks which have troubled many members of our community. Let's get down to brass tacks: Mr. Weechoo plans to resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how time has only reinforced that conviction. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propanganda surrounding his promotion of moral relativism. Tell everyone you know that if Weechoo had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit that if we let him dump effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers, then greed, corruption, and collectivism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.
I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that Weechoo's excuses are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I debunk the nonsense spouted by Weechoo's zealots, his invariant response is to destroy the heart and fabric of our nation. I would like to give you an example of how cuckoo Weechoo can be. Weechoo has admitted that he intends to spam the Internet with parasitic e-mail. Okay, that may have been a particularly bald-faced and unsubtle example but Weechoo presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to mortgage away our future. His conniving attempt to construct a creative response to my previous letter was absolutely pitiful. Really, Weechoo, stringing together a bunch of solecistic insults and seemingly random babble is hardly effective. It simply proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he will stop at nothing to evoke a misdirected response to genuine unresolved grievances. This may sound outrageous but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, if we take Weechoo's stratagems to their logical conclusion, we see that one of these days, Weechoo will advocate his shenanigans amid a hue and cry as pushy as it is combative.
Try as I may, I can't understand why Weechoo would want to turn our country into a foolish cesspool overrun with scum, disease, and crime. Now, I'm going to be honest here. His mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. Now that you've read my entire letter, I hope you've concluded that my plan to appeal for comity between us and Mr. Weechoo is deserving of serious consideration.

__________________

Vydar

I'm not writing this letter so that I can change Mr. Ricky Gilbert's mind but rather to help others with open minds understand that Ricky would rather talk about making changes than actually make them. To plunge right into it, if I were a complete sap, I'd believe Ricky's line that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Ricky himself). Unfortunately for Ricky, I realize that he has come up with proven methods to make people weak and dependent. All you have to do is let your guard down.
Every time Ricky attempts to control, manipulate, and harm other people, I feel a surge of pure, unadulterated hatred flow through my body. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. Perhaps it sounds like stating the obvious to say that he maintains that either governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments or that you and I are objects for him to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. Ricky denies any other possibility. He lives for one reason and for one reason only: to work both sides of the political fence. We must show him that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show Ricky that we can reveal some shocking facts about his paroxysms. Maybe then Ricky will realize that people tell me that the ideas backing up his dissertations are extremely irritating and nutty. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course.
Ricky lives and breathes heathenism. In view of that, it is not surprising that many of the people I've talked to have said that Ricky and his adulators should all be put up against a wall and given traitors' justice. Without commenting on that specifically I'd merely like to point out that experience shows that Ricky is morally debased and has no convictions of right or wrong. That said, let me continue. Did you know that some sleazy kleptomaniacs want to help Ricky use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future? Others just want to ride the interdenominationalism bandwagon. In either case, many people think of Ricky's recalcitrant tractates as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which hypersensitive wastrels will give rise to tactless pantywaists some day. A second all-too-serious item is that Ricky keeps telling everyone within earshot that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. I'm guessing that Ricky read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that his canards always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

__________________

weechoo

I'm not an activist and I'm not a cynic. I'm just a person who wants to wage war on Jacobinism. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what Vydar's particularly dictatorial form of solecism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of vexatious politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution. No matter how close he's come to making me have a nervous breakdown, he won't be satisfied until he finds a way to hammer away at the characters of all those who will not help him erect a shrine of particularism. I feel no more personal hatred for Vydar than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. He should think about how his opinions lead jaded dipsomaniacs to label everyone he doesn't like as a racist, sexist, fascist, communist, or some equally terrible "-ist". If Vydar doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet.
I've never bothered Vydar. Yet Vydar wants to turn the trickle of Marxism into a tidal wave. Whatever happened to "live and let live"? Each of these issues is central to the nepotism debate, as if it made any difference. If we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how the real question here is not, "Is Vydar so brutish as to think that this can go on forever?". The real question is rather, "Whatever happened to community standards?" Before you answer, let me point out that Vydar once said that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that Vydar doubtlessly believes that the future of the entire world rests in his hands. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is he living in? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Vydar would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being subversive. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

__________________

Emolad

vydar, who is this ricky guy?

__________________