Druushk wtf SoE - Page 12

Skel · 02-23-2008, 04:26 AM

I think the funnier part is the parse they have is from "pics or it didnt happen" boy who is asshurt that i kicked him from guild and trying to make drama. Failed

Loudness · 02-23-2008, 04:35 AM

well you can't blame him, after he got kicked the only place that would put up with his drama was disso, and thats where he planned on going, so he had to provide something that made him look cool. now hes just giving up the game because disso apparently doesn't want him either.

TANGARTH · 02-23-2008, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

I think the funnier part is the parse they have is from "pics or it didnt happen" boy who is asshurt that i kicked him from guild and trying to make drama. Failed

Failed is you guys on valor right now. How can you lie and shit about this like you did on AOM, it's like a repeat performance but this time you think you can get away with it because the mobs in an instance.

Skel · 02-23-2008, 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TANGARTH

Failed is you guys on valor right now.

Woah man all those massive t8 avatar kills you have? Keep talking idiot

BTW how bout you ask leorra if we exploited that encounter. Double fail

TANGARTH · 02-23-2008, 04:43 AM

How much time do you think it will take to post 'new' log files?

Skel · 02-23-2008, 04:44 AM

You really cant read can you?

Loudness · 02-23-2008, 04:45 AM

I'm pretty sure he can't, because if he could he would know that we never denied the script was bugged, we corrected snarks when he said there were no adds.

nice

try

Dogmae · 02-23-2008, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobz69

meh, i like druushk too except imo his adds are broken still, they just disapear, vanish from the world, despawn before they get to the raid and do all kinds of wierd and random shit.

The adds where buggy. It was a new encounter, nobody that killed it was talking strats. Our 7th pull or so we decided to slow DPS on Druushk, and when we did that there was only a couple adds that spawned at the start of the fight. So it seemed to us that it was a slow dps fight. If you take a look at the logs you have, you should see somebody, alvarez maybe, say something about crab pants. We also still had 4 people in the raid, clicking statues, which you can tell by comparing to the 3 earlier pull parses you have.

I'm sorry that when you where having trouble with the encounter that I couldn't tell you why it bugged out for us, because as far as we knew when we killed it, it was slow DPS.

Fomka · 02-23-2008, 07:02 AM

just wow at this ghosting exploit. I actually thought VP was working like EH, where 2nd or 3rd lvl would be empty untill you clear previous lvl's and open barriers.

Gaige · 02-23-2008, 07:20 AM

I present to you the patented Skel exploit denial strategy:

First, you have the posted proof ridiculed:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

so, you have an html file thats easily editable and it says we used a trick? Congratz

CONGRATZ ON YOUR FAKE PROOF, WE'RE UBER HAHAHAHAH!

Then, after awhile, you have admittance:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

So i have decided to come clean. Please atleast read what i have to say, and then feel free to say whatever you want about me. I would like to appoligise to the EQ2 community and my guild as well.

Yes, we locked the sorcs. It was my decision to do it and against the will of many others. Although, aftermath understands when to be indians. It was never my intention to even talk about the kill, much less claim a WW rank. Unfortunatly, someone from butcherblock posted about it and it snowballed from there. Sorry for those who felt slighted, decieved, or anything else. It was a bad choice on my part, but i just wanted him off our server so something else would spawn.

Im sure you have all lost respect for me, but please dont let my decision reflect heavily on aftermath as a whole. All of a leaders transgressions cant be blamed on those who follow him. Flame me, hate me, but ask yourself if you are really that different. Have none of you ever taken advantage of a mob? Woushi, TTR Mayong?

Yes i have learned my lession and realise that it will be a long uphill road from here on for me. But i ask you to please be polite and let us take a legitimate shot at him instead of having 50+ people lag us out.

Whoops, I'm sorry. I must've accidentally lied on purpose. We're actually exploiting douchebags, just saying!

Then you have an emo filled sniffle fest like so:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

Thats fine, like i said you can hate me. I guess we just have different views on what the right way to kill something is.

You can hate me guys because we exploited AoM /sniffle, but I mean, maybe we just have different views on what the right way to kill something is! Obviously Skel views the right way to kill Druushk is by bugging the adds so you don't have to fight them. Dogmae references this amazing strat as the Aftermath SlowDPS standard.

So let's see, in this thread already we have:

Proof ridiculed?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

How bout you ask the butt hurt inquiz that you got these logs from how it happened? Oh thats right he wont know because we didnt do shit to bug them or break the script. So try to talk shit about us for SoE's lack of programing skills. Im so hurt

Or what you are so benevolent that you would have just zoned out and let your lockout expire several days later just to hope the adds didnt bug again?

What logs? Oh from a butthurt ex-member!?! Obviously those don't matter, he was a butthurt liar. REMEMBER HOW EASY IT IS TO EDIT HTML LOLOLOL JUST SAYING. He also amazingly makes fun of SOE's coding skills and references numerous bugs, and then implies any guild in his shoes would do what he did, he is innocent afterall. This is the new and improved, anti-exploit Skel!

Uh oh, Skel's rage backlash against my witty and totally relevant HTML commentary

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

Um, ok... you lack any real response so you need to pull up hashed shit that makes no sense in context. You're awesome

Here is the context: Aftermath is accused of exploiting, again. The last time Skel cited the proof as unreliable because it was HTML which is easy to edit. In this thread Skel cited the proof as unreliable because it was from an ex-guildy or wtf ever. That seems like a pretty similiar parallel to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skel

I think the funnier part is the parse they have is from "pics or it didnt happen" boy who is asshurt that i kicked him from guild and trying to make drama. Failed

Oh c'mon Skel, we all know the funniest part is yet to happen. That will be when your guilt overwhelms you and you post an emo filled apology about how you made the call to exploit and you realize it will be a long, uphill road until next week when you exploit again.

In the end, we've all been here before. Its nothing new. Bad Skel!