Druushk wtf SoE - Page 26

Snark · 02-24-2008, 01:15 AM

no he has not, however I have no doubt that we could. His "change" was pretty small, not sure why some guilds find healing the statue people such a big bother.

Or is it that they fixed his leashing range and guilds are having more problems than they care to fess up too.

Snark · 02-24-2008, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mendanbar

I don't quite get why you're trying so hard at this, Snark...

I don't have the slightest clue what they did, but I'd give AM a much bigger pass on this than Elysium's claim...

Avatars are well known for being add fights. Druushk was changed, previously didn't have any adds like these, and if AM killed the zone in order, they would have fought a mob not long before that guess what.. punished them for doing too much dps. For the first time through the zone after the changes, making a temporary guess that adds not affecting them based on lowered dps seems like a relatively reasonable assumption.

They've found out since then it's not correct, and stated that it wasn't in fact working for them. Calling exploit on this is retarded though, exploitation requires knowing intent and continuation of doing whatever inappropriate actions they were doing based on that.

If they weren't doing something intentionally to break it, it's not exploiting.

Edit: Additionally, that doesn't mean they WOULDN'T have gotten the kill the appropriate way... what are they supposed to do now to prove something to you? They CAN'T re-earn them... so what do you expect? Delete them with no hope of doing the quest again?

Knowledge? They knew adds werent engaging, and to claim they thought it was "DPS" based is absurd. They must have never even glanced at their DPS numbers, beacuse they speak completely different than this. I would be glad to share with you the logs of their attempts to make this clear.

They pulled it with adds for quite a while , and then after a lapse in serious pulls (actually druusk was pulled 4 times with clear intention to wipe) they started recieving zero adds and zero script. Sorry, but this is way too incriminating to ignore. They continue to pull druusk without script and engaging adds until they finally kill it in a 5 minute burn.

Best case scenario for aftermath is that they were dumber than any guild this game has ever seen to begin with, so I guess it's not that bad regardless.

Slippery · 02-24-2008, 01:31 AM

26k seems to support low dps as most guilds are doing 65-75k+

Snark · 02-24-2008, 01:32 AM

26k was their average. Skel specifically cited spike DPS, which maxed at 35k.

Oh, and aftermath's DPS just sucks balls. That was by far their highest parse on Druusk.

Jaraxx · 02-24-2008, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slippery

26k seems to support low dps as most guilds are doing 65-75k+

What fucking guild parses 65-75k on nameds in Veeshans Peak?

Jaraxx · 02-24-2008, 01:35 AM

Before you make some fucking retarded post Arabel about how you were talking about trash mobs. (Which I know you fucking will). You were implying nameds!

Rizzel · 02-24-2008, 02:02 AM

snark, your looking at a fucking log file idiot... (which is quite pathetic i might add)

so let me get this straight. from reading a log, you can tell exactly the intent we had on every single pull, you can tell who went linkdead or wasnt ready for a pull ect. you have no information other than raw numbers and other bullshit. 26k dps is realy low, we thought it wad dps based, we killed it.

as fucking if, the same thing happend to dissolution im sure you would all zone out, and wait for the lockout to expire to try it again.... i could see it now... "hey guys, adds arent spawning anymore" "shit, wipe the mob we need to restart, because it must not be working correctly!"
fuck off. your just reaching for bullshit, and speculating trash. go play with your tinker toys.

youve seen multiple posts from multiple members admiting the encounter wasnt working right. did we know it wasnt working right at the time. NO. so if u want to keep crying, cry to sony, theyre the ones who fucked this up, not us.

pagansaint · 02-24-2008, 02:12 AM

Rizzel, he is on a drama crusade. He has nothing to stand on other than a disenfranchised ex AM member's log which doesn't show anything other than what Dog and Skel have said for the past near on twenty pages.

Drama whoring at its finest and you are just playing into his hands.

/hats off to Snark for keeping the circus going

Slippery · 02-24-2008, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaraxx

What fucking guild parses 65-75k on nameds in Veeshans Peak?

I'm sorry, just because it is a named mob lowers your dps by 40k+?

Snark · 02-24-2008, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rizzel

snark, your looking at a fucking log file idiot... (which is quite pathetic i might add)

so let me get this straight. from reading a log, you can tell exactly the intent we had on every single pull, you can tell who went linkdead or wasnt ready for a pull ect. you have no information other than raw numbers and other bullshit. 26k dps is realy low, we thought it wad dps based, we killed it.

as fucking if, the same thing happend to dissolution im sure you would all zone out, and wait for the lockout to expire to try it again.... i could see it now... "hey guys, adds arent spawning anymore" "shit, wipe the mob we need to restart, because it must not be working correctly!"
fuck off. your just reaching for bullshit, and speculating trash. go play with your tinker toys.

youve seen multiple posts from multiple members admiting the encounter wasnt working right. did we know it wasnt working right at the time. NO. so if u want to keep crying, cry to sony, theyre the ones who fucked this up, not us.

I know you were too stupid to realize it at the time. I have slowly come to accept that this improbable level of stupidity may in fact be legitimate.

However, now everyone knows that your epics were not deserved. Unlike strikes. So sucks to be you nub.