Quote:
Originally Posted by razieh
(snip)I disagree at the moment, no curse has been so detrimental that you cant let it where off. Therefor solo priest groups can deal with it if their curse is down.(snip)
|
I think that's kind of the problem, though. What's the point of the curses if you can just let them wear off? The Maestro curse on the healers is probably the best implementation I've seen so far because it forces you to think about your casting more, but it still doesn't sell me on the concept of a fifth cure type.
I just fought Tranquility as well and both of the curses in that fight could have fallen under the standard cure types without really changing how you'd set up that fight. The only thing that's different is that some people stay impaired longer. You don't need a special cure type with a 1 min recast to achieve that -- you get a similar effect from the way Trakanon's detrimentals work and he has no curses.
I don't know why, if they wanted to make curing more meaningful, they couldn't have taken out most of the annoyance effects and tuned the truly detrimental effects (like the "time bomb" types or disarms on the tanks) to work more consistently. You still get annoyance effects in the curse category and you still get encounters with curses where you have to play whack-a-mole with the other cure types (Maestro's reactive arcane) so nothing's really changed, they way I see it.