Wow how big of a tool is Grimwell - Page 22

Pinski · 02-22-2007, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelys

Why didn't you claim a 1stww on flames then.

Because what is the point of claiming a WW1st on Avatar of Flame, when you felt the fight was dumb, too easy, and completely similiar to the Avatar of Valor(and EVERY OTHER SINGLE FUCKING AVATAR). Why claim something, when there just isn't a real need to.

I still like your interview, where you don't even mention how fucking broken Wuoshi is. But as has been said. SD killed Wuoshi WW1st. HOWEVER, Wuoshi is being changed. Does that mean they lose their WW1st? No. It means that grats SD, they killed it 1st. Whoever kills the fixed version, who cares. Once a mob has been defeated, it has been defeated. It'd be like MO, and it's 3(or more) changes that it has gone through and each time somebody claiming a WW1st on it. No, NPU got it, end of story. You guys need to stop trying to cover up YOUR mistake(because it is your mistake of allowing the CR to go through with the post without making it fully well known that Avatar of Valor was NOT WW1st'd by your guild).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaleemsha

You have to admit that AoW V.2 version is an UPGRADED version, not a DOWNGRADED one ( prior testimony to the one that kill him, not the one that can't kill him + let it depop + false excuses, i give no names, so don't get cocky 'bout this one )

and to finish this....
IF SOE acknowledge that AoW V.2 is the real avatar, the one that was meant to be killed, the one to be rushed after an intriguing patch note, then all those 15 pages are going straight down to the trash can, and we ( that include us ) can't do anything 'bout it.

By the way, who the hell said Avatar of War got upgraded to 2.0 status? Do you have insider info that isn't publicly posted in the test notes? Shit, when the hell did Avatar of War get killed? And if that's a typo, then you're pretty fucking dumb because W and V aren't even close to each other on AZERTY or QWERTY key layouts. Please, proof read your fucking post before you post stupid shit. Shit, "Avatar de bravoure" doesn't even have a W in it. You are completely dumb. And Grimwell says that you guys contacted him.

I think I shall leave it at that. But please, read your posts BEFORE your post them again, otherwise people will pick apart every little thing you incorrect babble about.

Pinski · 02-22-2007, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levlelfe

But it's funny seeing Disso defend the guild that they have accused of a lot of thing for beeing the "Not so bad Second WW Guild"

Can be sure that here they not defend primally SD, but them ... dealing with the fact that there is enaught of one guild that make accomplishments before them !

I don't really know who is the dumbass here

No, I'm going to defend facts. You are going to play hyperbole and call it facts. We're not defending SD directly, we are defending the guild who killed Avatar of Valor 1st. It just happens that it's SD. If Avatar of Below gets changed, and you guys do your stupid bullshit and do the same thing on it that you just did with Avatar of Valor, then we'll be defending CL. You know how much Disso is anti-CL right? Probably more anti-CL than anti-SD. It's about facts. Shit, I bet you're going to now once/if(because let's face it, it's broken as hell) Avatar of Flame is changed, you're going to do the same damn thing and call it WW1st Avatar of Flame!! When in reality, all you did was act ignorant.

Taucher · 02-22-2007, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelys

If you're happy with semi working encounters being world wide firsts when they're killed, then that's ok to me, but I'll just disagree.

The only reason it was changed was because it was killed.

Congratulations on following in our footsteps regardless.

Pinski · 02-22-2007, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelys

If you're happy with semi working encounters being world wide firsts when they're killed, then that's ok to me, but I'll just disagree. And keep claiming what I feel is right. If you think I'm an idiot for doing so, it's your own problem. I personally think you are retarded for thinking that.

And it's true that SOE is not helping much with 95% of the mobs being bugged. But it doesn't mean killing an easier version of a mob has any worth. It hasn't got any.

Of course the first time the AoV was killed, will forever be by SD. But it was not the fixed version. And that should forever be remembered too. Just like every other first kills that were on an easier version than intended, sadly.

Stop acting like robots with your "they killed the name "Avatar of Valor" first!", and use some common sense.

So, you have now said that SD's kill on Wuoshi is not the "working as intended" WW1st. Grats.

Levlelfe · 02-22-2007, 12:22 AM

yeah we ww1st the fixed avatar of valor.

we know that Disso is anti-guild that can rox their ass, yes we know

Angelys · 02-22-2007, 12:22 AM

So if suddenly a patch totally break an Avatar that hasn't been killed, and this Avatar wouldn't do anything but auto attacking, and a random casual raiding guild that hasn't cleaned Menace decides to try it before any one else and kill it flawlessly because it would be easier than killing a random named in labo, they would deservedly be entitled of the ww1st?

You guys make so much sense.

Levlelfe · 02-22-2007, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinski

So, you have now said that SD's kill on Wuoshi is not the "working as intended" WW1st. Grats.

Wuoshi is working as intended, but u can exploited him (Did u see all the kill of him, did u know how many guild made their strat by avoiding wuoshi's adds ? i guess no)

AoV v1 is not working as intended, not coz of exploited, coz of a script bug.

Here is the difference.

U can fight Wuoshi right now, and after the futur patch with the same strat if u manage to kill wuoshi's adds since u kill him
That is not the case with AoV that's all.