Wow how big of a tool is Grimwell - Page 83

LFG · 02-26-2007, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinski

149 out of 183(81.4%) is more closely stated as 4 out of 5, than 9 out of 10.

I'm talking about the ratio between choice number 1 and 2 only, not 3, which I felt was more of an accurate reflection of what he meant.

Talonis · 02-26-2007, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelys

If you don't give a shit, why do you even post here?
You do obviously care in a way or another.

I'm only answering to those who think we're trying to "steal" the 1stww from SD. Which is untrue. The fact that people don't care about what we did doesn't mean I should let the lies spreading around.

The two things are the same. You are pushing your definition of what constitutes a WW1st. The overwhelming majority of the raiding community is throwing a collective bullshit flag and saying your definition is wrong. Yet you and Levle have continued for 80 pages to try and change our minds. You guys have even resorted to questioning the legitimacy of the true WW1st by SD. That is hallowed ground you piss upon to the people that covet such accomplishments.

It's probably better that you guys drink a warm mug of STFU and take your new found knowledge of what constitutes a real WW1st and get to the business of pulling raid mobs instead of the community's collective leg.

Henladar Bloodheart · 02-26-2007, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelys

If you don't give a shit, why do you even post here?
You do obviously care in a way or another.

I'm only answering to those who think we're trying to "steal" the 1stww from SD. Which is untrue. The fact that people don't care about what we did doesn't mean I should let the lies spreading around.

You came here and claimed WW1st on AoV.. no matter what version you claimed it on you were trying to steal glory so STFU and get a fucking clue.

Levlelfe · 02-26-2007, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhaz

Now, onto this whole "exploit" thing. It has been stated multiple times in worldwide channels by your members that your guild does this, and at those times they defended it the same way that EL defended the fabled death coordination, congratulations again. I don't believe I need to say much more, other than your attempt to play dumb about this whole thing was completely unnecessary, seeing as your members publicly claim that it is a legit strat. You might want to clear up your stories with them before you go spouting more bullshit.

i know nothing about the exploit you speak about and i don't care u call us exploiters or not but ... (tell me the name of our guildie or a screen or something more than "i see your guildies on ww channel")
ahahah ! Like ur legit acces to DT ?
a guy from NPU that speak of exploits... O_B_V_I_O_U_S !

LFG · 02-26-2007, 05:02 PM

I just have one comment:

Ten Ton Hammer owns!

Avatar Controversy Ends!

razieh · 02-26-2007, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flaeme

At least if you're trying to make a point, make sure you do it correctly. If you try and redicule someone, whose native language isn't English, because his writing skills suck ass at least make sure you don't make any mistakes yourself. It just makes you look like an even bigger retard.

So your statement that my guild sucks has a lot more to do with the argument right? You just keep screaming and spitting random BS, maybe someone will give a damn.

Look jerk if you took the time to read my statement I was saying IGNORING YOU'RE USE OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.

Rampagious · 02-26-2007, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levlelfe

i know nothing about the exploit you speak about and i don't care u call us exploiters or not but ... (tell me the name of our guildie or a screen or something more than "i see your guildies on ww channel")
ahahah ! Like ur legit acces to DT ?
a guy from NPU that speak of exploits... O_B_V_I_O_U_S !

Wait....you are all from France, and NPU is fucking Lance Armstrong, they basically dominates you. You definately do not have rights to shit talk them.

Laodaron · 02-26-2007, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LFG

I just have one comment:

Ten Ton Hammer owns!

Avatar Controversy Ends!

Glad that's all cleared up......

Talonis · 02-26-2007, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grimwell, on the Official Forums:

I also talked to the devs about the reports of it being broken and then 'fixed' and if the first kills were considered exploitation of a broken encounter.

The encounter was 'broken' in that there are some spawns that should happen randomly during the battle when things are going right. One of the spawns wasn't working, so any time it's number was called, nothing would happen. That said, the Avatar itself wasn't broken or fighting in a sub-par manner and anyone killing him has achieved something of note.

So while some people may debate the split hair about which version should 'count' for the kill, at the end of the day the first kill in the logs is going to be respected( in this case ). The Avatar wasn't broken himself, and there was nothing any player could exploit about the encounter.

The quote of the thread...

Laodaron · 02-26-2007, 05:54 PM

Haha wonder what the retort will be to that?