Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinion
Why does sony make things like spell shield if they arent meant to be used... why not make the encounter more thought out to begin with.. maybe hey! all her spells could = disease or poison and as a result she highly mitigates anything disease or poison so even if you reflect her stuff...it doesnt hurt as much if at all.
but no there all the same old shitty fights with raid wide proximity based AEs.
I dont even carry around resist gear for those kinds of mobs all I do is max range and watch it hit me for less then some clown with 8000 more resists because they were closer.
|
...first of all, I would have to say that Matron is a pretty well thought out encounter imo. The only bad part about it is the ports, and the ports would be fine, just random heroic mobs it porting you into is just retarded. Anyways - you can't really bitch about ranged-based AEs on this encounter, compared to resist-based because this is a well designed ranged base AE. Close you are, the less power drain you take, but the more damage, and the farther you are, the less damage but the more of a power drain. I think that is definately well thought out and better than resist imo. Reguardless I do agree that it is stupid they are no longer allowing spell shield to be used. If anything, they should put in the code things that can not be reflected, such as obviously enfeeblement, and allow other, not as crucial things to be in fact reflected.
Re: so spellshield no longer reflects matron
